Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:16:57PM +0200, Martin Vermeer spake thusly: | >> My primary objective with this is to parametrize the docbook list code >> by moving stuff from LyX to the .layout files. (Yes, this makes them a >> little messier looking right now. Doesn't bother the end user nor the >> LaTeX-only user.) >> >> This is not finished yet: inside simpleDocBookOnePar there is the >> listitem/para stuff still irritatingly hardwired. (In AGU this takes >> the form <item><p>.) > | Here is the slightly improved version. Now also listitem/para inside | simpleDocBookOnePar is fully parametrized: it takes the default layout | name (para for docbook, p for AGU) to build the innermost tags in list | items. I suspect this must be generally valid (?) > | Does this more clearly illustrate the idea? > | Check-in later today, shout to object ;-)
Object! I am all for cleaning up and parametization. But I am not quite sure what implications this will have. What I do not like (seemingly) is that docbook get it cleaned up, latex stays ugly. We need to have solutions that make the .layout format better and that works with all first-class output formats. How does this listitem stuff fit with LaTeX? Does it fit at all? -- Lgb