On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 08:49:17PM +0300, Guy Rutenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Guy Rutenberg
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> >> So, Guy, you can drop support for python 2.6. I also see that there would
> >> b
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Guy Rutenberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>> So, Guy, you can drop support for python 2.6. I also see that there would
>> be another enhancement, if you would like to have a stab at it. When
>> calling
>> lyx
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> So, Guy, you can drop support for python 2.6. I also see that there would
> be another enhancement, if you would like to have a stab at it. When
> calling
> lyx2lyx, the script uses "python" to invoke the interpreter, such that the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:57:54AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 11 July 2015 18:02:31 Richard Heck wrote:
> > For 2.2, I believe we are planning to TRY to make our our scripts
> > compatible with Python 3. I am almost certain we will not need support
> > for 2.6, though.
> >
> > Richar
On Saturday 11 July 2015 18:02:31 Richard Heck wrote:
> For 2.2, I believe we are planning to TRY to make our our scripts
> compatible with Python 3. I am almost certain we will not need support
> for 2.6, though.
>
> Richard
For 2.2 the minimum requirement for python is 2.7 (released more than
On 07/11/2015 12:13 PM, Guy Rutenberg wrote:
Hi,
The lyxpak.py uses `os.popen`, which is deprecated since Python-2.6.
Furthermore, it causes the script to fail for files with quotes in
their name, e.g., quote"quote.lyx. The attached patch fixes this issue
by switching to use the module subpro
