On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:57:54AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Saturday 11 July 2015 18:02:31 Richard Heck wrote: > > For 2.2, I believe we are planning to TRY to make our our scripts > > compatible with Python 3. I am almost certain we will not need support > > for 2.6, though. > > > > Richard > > For 2.2 the minimum requirement for python is 2.7 (released more than 5 > years ago). :-)
So, Guy, you can drop support for python 2.6. I also see that there would be another enhancement, if you would like to have a stab at it. When calling lyx2lyx, the script uses "python" to invoke the interpreter, such that the first python found in the PATH would be used. As it could be a wrong version, we can replace "python" with the path to the current interpreter, which surely is the right version. This may seem superfluous when the scripts will work with either python 2.7 or 3.x, but in the mean time it would help. -- Enrico
