rgheck wrote:
> > At least we can apply the following (makes protected space look like
> > normal space, except for the color).
>
> Fine with me.
done.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
This must be something weird about your fonts. A normal space is the
width of, uh, a normal space and a thin space is 1/6 the width of an
'M'. Thus:
Well, the difference is smaller than before.
These look pretty different. But we could chang
rgheck wrote:
> This must be something weird about your fonts. A normal space is the
> width of, uh, a normal space and a thin space is 1/6 the width of an
> 'M'. Thus:
Well, the difference is smaller than before.
> These look pretty different. But we could change the color, too, if you
> wanted.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
width(char_type('M')) for the em size.
Now that I see it, I have to say that I do not really like it. It might be
more WYSIWYG, but at the cost of MYSIWYM. The two most frequently used spaces
rgheck wrote:
> I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
> width(char_type('M')) for the em size.
Now that I see it, I have to say that I do not really like it. It might be
more WYSIWYG, but at the cost of MYSIWYM. The two most frequently used spaces
(by me), thinspace and normalspac
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This doesn't seem to be correct. Here is how those spaces are defined
in LaTeX:
\def\enspace{\kern.5em }
\def\enskip{\hskip.5em\relax}
\def\quad{\hskip1em\relax}
\def\qquad{\hskip2em\relax}
I've made the spaces match this, more or less, using
width(char_type('M')) f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You can take the width of the 'm' letter, which was the original
> definition.
'M' (capital), for that matter. However, this never was the original
definition. The original definition refers to the height of the body (the
metal block of the letter).
> I read some
rgheck wrote:
> Jurgen, would you want it for branch?
Yes.
Jürgen
rgheck wrote:
> Can we find out how big an em is?
An em is exactly the font size. So for a 10pt font, 1 em = 10 pt. Roughly, it
also matches the width of the letter "M".
Jürgen
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I doubt they're really right, but they look better than what we
> had, which fixes the width of a quad e.g. independently of the font
> size. So: Can we find out how big an em is? Is there some fixed
> relationship between the size of an em and the size of
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:33:54PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Forgot another one.
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:33:54PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> Forgot another one.
>
> Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
> spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
> size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which
rgheck wrote:
Attached is a simple-minded patch that adjusts the display size of some
spaces in LyX. This makes the interword and protected spaces the same
size as a normal space rather than the same size as an "x", which in my
default screen fonts looks too big. I've also adjusted the size o
13 matches
Mail list logo
