rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I doubt they're really right, but they look better than what we > had, which fixes the width of a quad e.g. independently of the font > size. So: Can we find out how big an em is? Is there some fixed > relationship between the size of an em and the size of an interword > space?
You can take the width of the 'm' letter, which was the original definition. I read somewhere it is not really true, but it might be good enough. JMarc
