On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Marc
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:09:01PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:33:23 +0100
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Still, I maintain that detecting the text direction automatically based
> > on the Unicode code point would simplify things.
>
> Yes, why n
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:33:23 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:47:44 +0100
> > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:47:44 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
Actually I t
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:47:44 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
> > Actually I think you
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
This is not accurate. It's true for URL, for example, but not for ERT. I
agree with Abdel that ideally, in ERT we should a
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apart from that it would also make Jean-Marc happy...
Yes. Everytime an explicit xxx_CODE test gets added to the source, a
baby seal is murdered. You do not want that, do you?
JMarc
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>This is not accurate. It's true for URL, for example, but not for ERT. I
> >>agree with Abdel that ideally, in ERT we should allow any encod
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer writes:
But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR tr
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:50:31PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
> >Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>Martin Vermeer writes:
> >>>
> >But I am not sure I understand. Why is for
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer writes:
But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR tru
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer writes:
>> But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer writes:
But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true for ERT? Just for
display purpose?
The truth is, it shouldn't be. We're overloading
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:40:51PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 02:16:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp
URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/tr
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 02:16:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp?rev=21407
===
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:52 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about declaring forceLTR in the Inset class (returning
false by default) and overriding it for graphics, math and hyperlink?
This would simplify this code and avoid the cast to insetco
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 02:16:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp
> > URL:
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp?rev=21407
> > ===
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:49:22 +0100
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true for ERT? Just for
> >>> display purpose?
> >> Hmmm. It is to force the langua
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:38:20 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true for ERT? Just for
> >> display purpose?
> >
> > Hmmm. It is to force the language, and thus the encoding, to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true for ERT? Just for
display purpose?
Hmmm. It is to force the language, and thus the encoding, to Latin1.
LaTeX needs that; LyX display would be happy with Unicode, but isn
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But I am not sure I understand. Why is forceLTR true for ERT? Just for
>> display purpose?
>
> Hmmm. It is to force the language, and thus the encoding, to Latin1.
> LaTeX needs that; LyX display would be happy with Unicode, but isn't
> smart enough to
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:07:32 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Also, why exactly is ERT a special case?
> >
> > At least that I can answer ;-) Because we want ERT output to be
> > "naked". In any locale. No \L stuff or the l
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, why exactly is ERT a special case?
>
> At least that I can answer ;-) Because we want ERT output to be
> "naked". In any locale. No \L stuff or the like around it.
Hmm, could we use noFontChange for that?
/**
* Is this inset a
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:52 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp
> > URL:
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp?rev=21407
> > =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp?rev=21407
> ==
> --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/Paragraph.cpp (original)
> +++ lyx-deve
26 matches
Mail list logo
