Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >If _really_ needed, we can
> > put the read-only setting inside a DEVEL_VERSION block, but I do not
>
> yes, i would like to have it.
its in r33402.
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
> > my real point here was different though - its adding unnecessary pain for
> > people working on docs. the distinction seemed to be clear here - lyx i use
> > is normally installed and i'm not allowed to edit help files when using
> > help menu,
Pavel Sanda writes:
> my real point here was different though - its adding unnecessary pain for
> people working on docs. the distinction seemed to be clear here - lyx i use
> is normally installed and i'm not allowed to edit help files when using
> help menu, while its editable in svn checkouts.
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >this looks wrong. readonly status should reflect readonly status of the
> >file itself and when users on mac are allowed to edit it, mac installer
> >should be changed, not this imho.
>
> No, the read-only status indicates whether the user is allowed to chang
"Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" writes:
>>this looks wrong. readonly status should reflect readonly status of the
>>file itself and when users on mac are allowed to edit it, mac installer
>>should be changed, not this imho.
Proper mac apps don't have an installer :)
>
> No, the read-only status i
>> Log:
>> Make LFUN_HELP_OPEN open the document in read-only mode.
>>
>> This fixes problems where Mac users can modify the documentation by
>> mistake. Note that it is still possible to open those document by
>> explicit path or to toggle off the read-only status (but this is only
>> useful t
lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: lasgouttes
> Date: Fri Jan 29 13:01:17 2010
> New Revision: 33260
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/33260
>
> Log:
> Make LFUN_HELP_OPEN open the document in read-only mode.
>
> This fixes problems where Mac users can modify the documentation
> by mistak
