On 24-Oct-2001 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Please tell me when you have implemented the needed stuff. I can
> probably help you with the GUI-work.
> No matter if this takes a bit time, since my time is a little bit
> limited now, too.
Done, go for it ;)
Forget about the "Rows" info in the
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > Much more clear, what is going on. :-)
> > BUt not for 1.2.0 I guess, no?
>
> Well I would regard this as a bug fix in the GUI interface and would
> add the needed calls to the set the (double-border) options in the
>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:52:14AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > I have decided that they are the same since there isn't any distintion
> > between them in docbook.
>
> So in docbook you don't have the distinction between first header a
On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I have decided that they are the same since there isn't any distintion
> between them in docbook.
So in docbook you don't have the distinction between first header and header
and last footer and footer?
> Much more clear, what is going on.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:03:40AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > This question is probably for Juergen.
> > Why the long tables arguments get a negative value? Like this
> > ... endhead="-3" endfirsthead="-3" endfoot="-3" endlastfoot="-3" .
On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> This question is probably for Juergen.
> Why the long tables arguments get a negative value? Like this
> ... endhead="-3" endfirsthead="-3" endfoot="-3" endlastfoot="-3" ...
>
> When some code is both a header and a footer?
Did you try it?
