On 5 Sep 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:21:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> |
> | > Feature removal is always good ;-)
> |
> | nah. it's good for the source, terrible for the temperature on lyx-devel :)
>
> If I am not
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 03:25:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have now regained (some of) my wits...
Asger... would you please? ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:21:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Feature removal is always good ;-)
nah. it's good for the source, terrible for the temperature on lyx-devel :)
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince" is not the set textbook for
CS1072 Professional Issues ? What on ea
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:10:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> But feature removal is as bad as feature adding in the run up to 1.2.0 ;)
Feature removal is always good ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | yes, if you have "File->New asks for name" enabled in look and feel -> misc
>
> I'd opt for removing that functionality...
> Who objects to that?
clearly somebody, I remember some discussion about when I changed stuff
in t
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:01:32PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> You mean there are cases where an additional dialog is shown??? If that's
> the case, I will remove this report from my list immediately.
yes, if you have "File->New asks for name" enabled in look and feel -> misc
regards
john
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, John Levon wrote:
> > - In menu "File", "New..." should be replaced by just "New" - there is no
> > further dialog
>
> it's dependent upon lyxrc prefs unfortunately, so a fix is not that simple.
> (i.e. not trivially simple)
You mean there are cases where an additional dial
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:30:16PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - In menu "File", "New..." should be replaced by just "New" - there is no
> further dialog
it's dependent upon lyxrc prefs unfortunately, so a fix is not that simple.
(i.e. not trivially simple)
john
--
"Do you mean to tell
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> To prepare for real changes in mathed I think it is time for some
> reformatting.
>
> I assume it is consensus that tab indenting are prefered over space.
>
> I am not so sure on:
>
>if (..) { if (...) {
> ...
On 14-Feb-2001 John Levon wrote:
> FWIW, the prophets K&R told us how it should be. And spaces are for
> format fascists (at least with tabs, I can be decadent with 4-space tabs
> if I want).
Well if you always can use an editor/viewer which can do 4-space tabs!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-.
On 14-Feb-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What about putting these rules as local-variable at the end of the
> document for emacs' cc-mode? At least those of us who use emacs for
> formatting will not have anytinh to do to get the right formatting.
>
> Of course, I do not really intend to
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Well I prefer the first and I also prefer a 4 space indent
Juergen> over a tab indent, but this is always a discussion point
Juergen> between us developers.
Juergen> IMO the important thing is that we have the same style over
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well I prefer the first and I also prefer a 4 space indent over a tab
> indent, but this is always a discussion point between us developers.
Isn't that a euphemism for "massive flamewar" :)
FWIW, the pro
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To prepare for real changes in mathed I think it is time for some
| reformatting.
|
| I assume it is consensus that tab indenting are prefered over space.
|
| I am not so sure on:
|
|if (..) { if (...) {
| ...
On 14-Feb-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> To prepare for real changes in mathed I think it is time for some
> reformatting.
>
> I assume it is consensus that tab indenting are prefered over space.
>
> I am not so sure on:
>
>if (..) { if (...) {
> ...
15 matches
Mail list logo
