Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 17.08.2007, at 11:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Otoh, as long as static linking works, I am not too unhappy, it just means we do not better than before. Then please let static be the default again. +1 Andi

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otoh, as long as static linking works, I am not too unhappy, it just > means we do not better than before. Then please let static be the default again. JMarc

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:17:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I did not find a place where his variable is instantiated, actually. > >> How is this done? > > > > Thesaurus.cpp:121 > > I meant the place in the object code. > > I read a bi

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/suse/usr/src/lyx/release-dynamic/src > nm Thesaurus.o | > grep thesaurus > B _ZN3lyx9thesaurusE > > 'B' - BSS (uninitialized data) Unfortunately, I do not have access to my mac now, and since I leave this evening for two mor

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok. Glad to here that. No I need only a positive report from a Mac user. > > OK, almost positive :) I build here with pkg-config installed from > macports, and Qt is 4.3.0. > >

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:06:44AM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Same effects here, static works, shared does not, with the same > complaints. I count that as 'not worse than before'. We hat only static before... Andre'

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-17 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 16.08.2007, at 23:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ok. Glad to here that. No I need only a positive report from a Mac user. OK, almost positive :) I build here with pkg-config installed from macports, and Qt is 4.3.0. Note that I disable pch. au

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I did not find a place where his variable is instantiated, actually. >> How is this done? > > Thesaurus.cpp:121 I meant the place in the object code. I read a bit about flat namespace (see error message)and if the following page makes sense to you, we

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok. Glad to here that. No I need only a positive report from a Mac user. > > OK, almost positive :) I build here with pkg-config installed from > macports, and Qt is 4.3.0. > >

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2) a shared build. Libraries are not installed at the regular place, > but I think I can fix that. Compilation goes fine. I can install at the proper place (LyX.app/Contents/Frameworks if I believe apple) with the following patch. It does not cha

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok. Glad to here that. No I need only a positive report from a Mac user. OK, almost positive :) I build here with pkg-config installed from macports, and Qt is 4.3.0. Note that I disable pch. autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61 automake (GNU automake) 1.10

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:59:10PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:24:05AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:12:04PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > > > The probl

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:24:05AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:12:04PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > The problem with automake+libtools is that it takes about twice as much > > > time as ei

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unfortunately, this won't work on Windows as DLLs needs to be > self-contained and our current spaghetti mess does not lend itself to > modularization. Fortunately enough, --disable-shared --enable-static > is supposed to produce the old static behaviou

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:12:04PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > The problem with automake+libtools is that it takes about twice as much > > time as either scons, cmake or qmake in the 'building backend'. > > On linux I don'

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >The general idea, however, is to use autoconf+whatever (with > >whatever=qmake currently being worked on) instead of autoconf+automake > >+libtools as the official build system until either the scons or the > >c

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > The problem with automake+libtools is that it takes about twice as much > time as either scons, cmake or qmake in the 'building backend'. On linux I don't see any difference wrt the previous setup. It takes about 15 minutes to build

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote: The general idea, however, is to use autoconf+whatever (with whatever=qmake currently being worked on) instead of autoconf+automake +libtools as the official build system until either the scons or the cmake people claim to have a full replacement to wh

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: The general idea, however, is to use autoconf+whatever (with whatever=qmake currently being worked on) instead of autoconf+automake +libtools as the official build system until either the scons or the cmake people claim to have a full replacement to what we have now. Can y

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:59:13AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:08:19AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > Regarding the autotools system...it doesn't now seem possible to do this: > > cd src/insets/ > > make Inset.o > > or even: > > cd src/ > > make

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:08:19AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > Regarding the autotools system...it doesn't now seem possible to do this: >cd src/insets/ >make Inset.o > or even: >cd src/ >make src/Inset.o > The former gives a slew of errors starting with: >Inset.cpp:15:20: e

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Richard Heck
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:08:19AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: Regarding the autotools system...it doesn't now seem possible to do this: cd src/insets/ make Inset.o or even: cd src/ make src/Inset.o The former gives a slew of errors starting with: I

Re: Question About New Build System

2007-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:08:19AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > Regarding the autotools system...it doesn't now seem possible to do this: > cd src/insets/ > make Inset.o > or even: > cd src/ > make src/Inset.o > The former gives a slew of errors starting with: > Inset.cpp:

Question About New Build System

2007-08-14 Thread Richard Heck
Regarding the autotools system...it doesn't now seem possible to do this: cd src/insets/ make Inset.o or even: cd src/ make src/Inset.o The former gives a slew of errors starting with: Inset.cpp:15:20: error: config.h: No such file or directory and the latter complains thusly: i