Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
>
>> Otherwise the format is the same as before, only that now optional
>> arguments are allowed.
>
> So we need a fileformat change with a revert routine that deletes the
> arguments. This should be easy to do. I'll have a look wh
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Otherwise the format is the same as before, only that now optional arguments are
allowed.
So we need a fileformat change with a revert routine that deletes the arguments. This should be easy
to do. I'll have a look when I'm testing.
regards Uwe
Am 07.10.2007 um 20:06 schrieb Asger Ottar Alstrup:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
Feel free to ask if something is unclear in the code. What is the
way to proceed now?
How did you test this yourself? How ready is it to release
Am 07.10.2007 um 20:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
I propose that you create a LyX-file that described how to use the
new features. If possible, add some examples to it. I can then test
if it works as expected and report you bugs.
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs. Feel
free to ask if something is unclear in the code. What is the way to
proceed now?
How did you test this yourself? How ready is it to release quality? Did
you write documentation for the feature?
> I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it performs.
I propose that you create a LyX-file that described how to use the new features. If possible, add
some examples to it. I can then test if it works as expected and report you bugs. While writing the
docmentation you'll surely s
So here it is, a port of my dynamic macro branch to 1.6svn. As
expected the patch is not small. Unfortunately there is no sensible
way to split it up, because most of it is heavily interconnected. So
for now I keep it like that.
I would be happy to hear some comments or reports how it perfo
