> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> I used 'relatively' because any change can potentially create
Dekel> new bugs, but I'm quite sure that this is not the case here.
Dekel> The patch really simplifies the use of insettabular, so maybe
Dekel> we should put it in 1.1.6 (w
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:16:07AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 25-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > I think it is relatively safe.
>
> Well relatively? I think we should left it for 1.2.0 only!
I used 'relatively' because any change can potentially create new bugs,
but I'm quite sure t
On 25-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> I think it is relatively safe.
>
Well relatively? I think we should left it for 1.2.0 only!
> Also, what about changing LyXTabular::Write to output only the attributes
> whose value is not the default value (and so reducing the file size) ?
No I don't thi
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> Also, what about changing LyXTabular::Write to output only the
Dekel> attributes whose value is not the default value (and so
Dekel> reducing the file size) ?
This is OK if we are sure the default values will not change later.
JMarc
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:52:05PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Jan-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > I do not have it anymore, but please only apply it if it is safe and
> > straightforward enough... In an ideal world, I'd only apply one-liners
> >:) [in fact, the two important
On 24-Jan-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I do not have it anymore, but please only apply it if it is safe and
> straightforward enough... In an ideal world, I'd only apply one-liners
>:) [in fact, the two important bug fixes we have are one-liners]
Well it surely is no oneliner :), but De
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Well it's a change of behaviour, but IMO we could also apply
Juergen> the patch for the 1_1_6 branch. Do you still have the file
Juergen> Dekel sent? Or should I download the 1_1_6 branch and apply
Juergen> it there?
I do not
On 24-Jan-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> I did apply the patch and it seems to work good. I'll commit
> Juergen> this as I see that it simplifies the code and that is
> Juergen> neccessary if we later go for an speed op
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> I did apply the patch and it seems to work good. I'll commit
Juergen> this as I see that it simplifies the code and that is
Juergen> neccessary if we later go for an speed optimizing.
Juergen, do you have simple and straightfo
On 12-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> A little more playing, and I got the following improvement:
> If the cursor is in an insettext in a cell of a tabular, and the user presses
> down, the cursor will enter the insettext of the cell below, keeping the x
> position as it had before (as much as po
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:38:02PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I got annoyed by the cursor handling in insettabular, i.e. the two dummy
> position in each cell, one before the insettext and one after.
> So I decided to change that and use only one dummy position.
> I think that the result is more i
I got annoyed by the cursor handling in insettabular, i.e. the two dummy
position in each cell, one before the insettext and one after.
So I decided to change that and use only one dummy position.
I think that the result is more intuitive to the user.
What do other think ?
Of course, this patch s
12 matches
Mail list logo
