Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 24. April 2017 um 17:13:23, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 22:21:04, schrieb Richard Heck > > > > > On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-24 Thread Pavel Sanda
Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 22:21:04, schrieb Richard Heck > > On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion > > > routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3? > > > > OK. > > > >

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 24.04.2017 a las 17:31, Richard Heck escribió: OK. It is in. regards Uwe

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-24 Thread Richard Heck
t; > this patch fixed some issues but Math.lyx uncovered an issue that I > introduced with this patch. > Attached is the patch for LyX 2.2.3 that allows to revert Math.lyx again. > > sorry and regards > Uwe

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-20 Thread Uwe Stöhr
patch. Attached is the patch for LyX 2.2.3 that allows to revert Math.lyx again. sorry and regards Uwe diff --git "a/C:\\Users\\Usti\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\TortoiseGit\\lyx_2_2-cac7b00.001.py" "b/D:\\LyXGit\\2.2.x\\lib\\lyx2lyx\\lyx_2_2.py" index c30477de17..a65f8ca67d 1006

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 17.04.2017 a las 21:57, Richard Heck escribió: I will look these over and commit them if they're acceptable. Attached are the obvious "\\" fixes that should be backported. regards Uwe diff --git "a/C:\\Users\\Usti\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\TortoiseGit\\lyx_2_0-0271602.002.py" "b/D:\\LyXGit\

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:30:19AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hi Richard, > > the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx. Scott > could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as expected. Just to be clear: when I report results of ctests, it is important to underst

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 17.04.2017 a las 21:57, Richard Heck escribió: OK. it is in. I will look these over and commit them if they're acceptable. thanks. regards Uwe

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-17 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/17/2017 03:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 17.04.2017 a las 17:22, Richard Heck escribió: > >> OK. > > It is in. > > Attached is another fix fixing the box reversion from 2.0 to 1.6. > Kornel verified that it works for him too OK to go in? OK. >> You can use git blame to identify where the cha

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 17.04.2017 a las 17:22, Richard Heck escribió: OK. It is in. Attached is another fix fixing the box reversion from 2.0 to 1.6. Kornel verified that it works for him too OK to go in? You can use git blame to identify where the changes come from. Then we can look at the individual commit

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-17 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/16/2017 11:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hi Richard, > > the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx. > Scott could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as > expected. Could this therefore also go in for LyX 2.2.3? OK. > Another issue: when I compare lyx-2_2.py

[patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - box reversion lyx2lyx

2017-04-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hi Richard, the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx. Scott could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as expected. Could this therefore also go in for LyX 2.2.3? -- Another issue: when I compare lyx-2_2.py in master with branch I see a lot of ch

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 16.04.2017 a las 04:21, Richard Heck escribió: OK. Thanks, it is in. regards Uwe

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-16 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 22:21:04, schrieb Richard Heck > On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion > > routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3? > > OK. > > rh -1 Unless the export of examples/PDF

Re: [patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hi Richard, > > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion > routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3? OK. rh

[patch] for LyX 2.2.3 - fix 2 errors in lyx2lyx

2017-04-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hi Richard, the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3? (In master they are already fixed but I winder why the issue with "\usepackage" instead of "\\usepackage" was fixed in master long ago but never backported.) thanks a

Re: Your patch for LyX

2014-02-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the > Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or later. > > Dustin J. Mitchell Thanks, Dustin. You're now added to the CREDITS (in Help > About). Best, Scott

Fwd: Your patch for LyX

2014-02-16 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or later. Dustin J. Mitchell -- Forwarded message -- From: Scott Kostyshak Date: Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:08 PM Subject: Your patch for LyX To: dus...@v.igoro.us Hi

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/30/2013 01:13 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 30.12.2013 um 17:59 schrieb Richard Heck : On 12/30/2013 06:06 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Hi Richard, I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? The attached

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 30.12.2013 um 17:59 schrieb Richard Heck : > On 12/30/2013 06:06 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package >> lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? >> >> The attached patch contains the mentioned

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
My second message was only about master... We still need gettext for 2.0.x. JMarc Richard Heck a écrit : >On 12/30/2013 06:06 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to >package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. I

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/30/2013 06:06 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Hi Richard, I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? The attached patch contains the mentioned change. Plus it contains the changes needed to build the packag

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 30/12/13 13:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 30/12/13 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit : Hi Richard, I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? The attached patch contains the mentioned change. Plus it

Re: Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 30/12/13 12:06, Stephan Witt a écrit : Hi Richard, I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? The attached patch contains the mentioned change. Plus it contains the changes needed to build the package o

Patch for lyx-2.0.x

2013-12-30 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi Richard, I had to use the current trunk version of the LyX build script to package lyx-2.0.7 So, I want to back port this version. Is it ok? The attached patch contains the mentioned change. Plus it contains the changes needed to build the package on my current Mac OS X 10.8.5 with Xcode 5.0.

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" writes: > So, now I can start complaining about Windows :) Yes please :) JMarc

RE: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-06 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>>> I hoped there would be a solution that would avoid changing LyXFunc >>> at all and just ignore() early when the key event are unknown. >> >> Ah, probably because you want to isolate all Qt-related code within >> frontends/qt4/. Here's yet another approach, at the keyPressEvent() >> level:

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Ben M." writes: >> I hoped there would be a solution that would avoid changing LyXFunc at all >> and just ignore() early when the key event are unknown. > > Ah, probably because you want to isolate all Qt-related code within > frontends/qt4/. Here's yet another approach, at the keyPressEvent() >

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 05/07/2009 16:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 2 juil. 09 à 04:00, Ben M. a écrit : I hoped there would be a solution that would avoid changing LyXFunc at all and just ignore() early when the key event are unknown. Ah, probably because you want to isolate all Qt-related code within front

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 04:34:45PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 5 juil. 09 � 16:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a �crit : > > Unfortunately this does not tell me that it is working. I am currently > > compiling on OS X, but the problem is to know what to test. > > Everything I tested on OS X

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 5 juil. 09 à 16:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Unfortunately this does not tell me that it is working. I am currently compiling on OS X, but the problem is to know what to test. Everything I tested on OS X seems correct. Abdel, could you have a look please? The plan could be to apply

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 2 juil. 09 à 04:00, Ben M. a écrit : I hoped there would be a solution that would avoid changing LyXFunc at all and just ignore() early when the key event are unknown. Ah, probably because you want to isolate all Qt-related code within frontends/qt4/. Here's yet another approach, at the k

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-01 Thread Ben M.
> I hoped there would be a solution that would avoid changing LyXFunc at all > and just ignore() early when the key event are unknown. Ah, probably because you want to isolate all Qt-related code within frontends/qt4/. Here's yet another approach, at the keyPressEvent() level: http://www.lyx.or

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 1 juil. 09 à 22:02, Ben M. a écrit : Thank you. I don't yet know proper C++ syntax, so I will do these silly things while I learn. No problem, I am here just for that. You are a very efficient student :) What I would like is to drop the "Unknown function part" and only test on isKnown.

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-01 Thread Ben M.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > First incident remark: use >      known = !qkey_to_string(key_).empty(); > instead. Thank you. I don't yet know proper C++ syntax, so I will do these silly things while I learn. > What I would like is to drop the "Unknown function par

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Ben M." writes: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> What I would like (but I have not understood yet where to do that) is to >> use reject() only when we have an unknown keysym. We should not reject >> events because M-C-j is not bound currently, but because a giv

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-06-30 Thread Ben M.
> Sure, how's this? >  http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6043/multimediakeys3.diff I verified that this patch also works on trunk. Multimedia keys do work in Document - Settings, and Tools - Preferences, but don't work in File - Open. I wonder if I missed a QKeyEvent somewhere. However,

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-06-30 Thread Ben M.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I would like (but I have not understood yet where to do that) is to > use reject() only when we have an unknown keysym. We should not reject > events because M-C-j is not bound currently, but because a given > multimedia key is not

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > What I would like (but I have not understood yet where to do that) is to > use reject() only when we have an unknown keysym. We should not reject ignore() > events because M-C-j is not bound currently, but because a given > multimedia key is not handled by

Re: Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-06-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Ben M." writes: > According to > http://doc.trolltech.com/3.3/qkeyevent.html#details > "Key events for multi media keys are ignored by default. You should > call QKeyEvent::accept() if your widget handles those events." Very good detective work (although you should point to the 4.2 documentati

Patch for LyX to ignore multimedia keys

2009-06-29 Thread Ben M.
According to http://doc.trolltech.com/3.3/qkeyevent.html#details "Key events for multi media keys are ignored by default. You should call QKeyEvent::accept() if your widget handles those events." Currently, LyX calls accept() for everything, so multimedia keys are undesirably blocked: http://w

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
>> The phantom feature is a math feature > > No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which > also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time). I know and use them often e.g. also in the EmbeddedObjects manual. But the suport for these comands is at the mome

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:40:19AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as > > > expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not > > > oppose it. > > > > The phantom feature is a math featu

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a >> font change would make the metrics bad). > > Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable). A collapsable separate from the space inset

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This is not good. The text should be any possible Text Inset (even a > font change would make the metrics bad). Then we need Tommaso's input widget (or a collapsable). Jürgen

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Where would you put the text? > > Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined > spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for > text ("Space in the lengt

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Where would you put the text? Like Helge outlined. The dialog would include a combo with all the predefined spaces (enspace etc.), then custom for a length (\hspace) and a widget for text ("Space in the length of the following string"). Jürgen

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I never thought about that... But of course you are right. > > I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace > dialog (in Texted). Where would you put the text? JMarc

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Helge Hafting
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I never thought about that... But of course you are right. I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace dialog (in Texted). Good idea. A dialog like: _ short space _ interword space _ enskip _ ems

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I never thought about that... But of course you are right. I think ui-wise, phantoms should be implemented in a forthcoming InsetSpace dialog (in Texted). Jürgen

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: >> The phantom feature is a math feature > > No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, which > also work outside mathed (I use them from time to time). I never thought about that... But of course you are right. JMarc

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as >> expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not >> oppose it. > > The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the > math toolbar. The mat

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as > > expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not > > oppose it. > > The phantom feature is a math feature No, \phantom, \vphantom and \hphantom are general (plain TeX) commands, whic

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qualifies as expert feature. I am not sure it belongs to the toolbar, but I do not oppose it. The phantom feature is a math feature so it should be accessible via the math toolbar. The math toolbar contains much more expert stuff than plac

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)? > > The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some > input > from math users first. I like this phantom feature a lot myself, but I think it qual

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)? The fraction changes are OK. For the placeholders, I'd like to have some input from math users first. Jürgen

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
>> OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0. > > Yes, please. What about the other changes (fraction, placeholders)? Uwe

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > OK I'll postpone this change to LyX 1.6.0. Yes, please. Jürgen

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> was the change from "math-insert > \choose" to "math-insert \binom" intentional? And if so, why? This is intended because LyX 1.6.0 will have \tbinom and \dbinom. So it will be confusing that the standard binom command is \choose. \choose is identic to \binom. OK I'll postpone this change to

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify > some entries. OK for branch? As I'm no math user, I do not have strong opinions. I guess \phantom is useful. Is it also often used? What do others say? The Fractions changes look good. However, was th

Re: [patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:33:59PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify > some entries. > OK for branch? > > regards Uwe > > p.s. lyx.org is currently dead In deep coma. But I did get a commit through... - Martin

[patch] for LyX 1.5.3 register placeholders to the math toolbar

2007-11-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
The attached patch registeres placeholders to the math toolbar and clarify some entries. OK for branch? regards Uwe p.s. lyx.org is currently dead Index: stdtoolbars.inc === --- stdtoolbars.inc (revision 21421) +++ stdtoolbars.inc

Re: [patch for LyX 1.5.2] add warning to the g-brief templates

2007-09-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Since I got no response from the marvosym package maintainer, g-brief won't > be usable for MiKTeX and TeXLive 2007 users. I therefore added a warning to > the templates to switch to g-brief2. > > What do you think? Fine with me. Jürgen

[patch for LyX 1.5.2] add warning to the g-brief templates

2007-09-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Since I got no response from the marvosym package maintainer, g-brief won't be usable for MiKTeX and TeXLive 2007 users. I therefore added a warning to the templates to switch to g-brief2. What do you think? regards Uwe Index: g-brief-de.lyx =

Re: Patch for LyX/Mac localedir (1.3.4cvs)

2004-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> This patch adapts Jean-Marc's proposed localdir patch so it Ronald> works only for LyX/Mac. It allows LyX/Mac to find its Ronald> localedir in the relocatable Application bundle. Should have Ronald> no effect on other architectu

Patch for LyX/Mac localedir (1.3.4cvs)

2004-02-10 Thread Ronald Florence
This patch adapts Jean-Marc's proposed localdir patch so it works only for LyX/Mac. It allows LyX/Mac to find its localedir in the relocatable Application bundle. Should have no effect on other architectures. (For 1.3.4) -- Ronald lyx-localedir.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.4.0)

2004-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> The attached patch is adapted from the corresponding patch to Ronald> 1.3.4cvs, and allows LyX/Mac to find the LyX fonts inside its Ronald> own relocatable application bundle. -- This is applied now. JMarc

Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.4.0)

2004-01-14 Thread Ronald Florence
The attached patch is adapted from the corresponding patch to 1.3.4cvs, and allows LyX/Mac to find the LyX fonts inside its own relocatable application bundle. -- Ronald 1.4.0-fonts.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:15:13PM -0500, Ronald Florence wrote: > No more than maxBufLen bytes are written to buffer. If url requires > more than maxBufLen bytes to represent itself, including the > terminating null byte. this function returns false. To avoid this IN which case we should real

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread Ronald Florence
On Jan 7, 2004, at 11:59 AM, John Levon wrote: All of the code changes are inside QT_WS_MAC defines. Looks fine + UInt8 buf[255]; + CFURLGetFileSystemRepresentation(FontsURL, true, buf, 255); But is this definitely correct ? (i.e. is the function API including null

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:10:49AM -0500, Ronald Florence wrote: > > All of the code changes are inside QT_WS_MAC defines. Looks fine + UInt8 buf[255]; + CFURLGetFileSystemRepresentation(FontsURL, true, buf, 255); But is this definitely correct ? (i.e. is the funct

Re: Revised patch for LyX/Mac 1.4.0

2004-01-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> Here is a revised patch for 1.4.0 to enable compilation on Ronald> MacOS with Qt/Mac, and to include various LyX/Mac features Ronald> (double-clicking from the finder, relocatable application, and Ronald> setting the PATH for th

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John> wrote: >> > "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Ronald> The attached patch to 1.3.4cvs -- suggested by Jean-Marc -- Ronald> lets LyX/Mac fin

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread Ronald Florence
On Jan 7, 2004, at 11:05 AM, John Levon wrote: Ronald> The attached patch to 1.3.4cvs -- suggested by Jean-Marc -- Ronald> lets LyX/Mac find additional fonts in its own application Ronald> bundle. The addFontPath code works, but does not get called by Ronald> qfont_loader::available. Instead, Qt f

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ronald> The attached patch to 1.3.4cvs -- suggested by Jean-Marc -- > Ronald> lets LyX/Mac find additional fonts in its own application > Ronald> bundle. The a

Re: Revised patch for LyX/Mac 1.4.0

2004-01-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Ronald> Here is a revised patch for 1.4.0 to enable compilation on | Ronald> MacOS with Qt/Mac, and to include various LyX/Mac features | Ronald> (double-clicking from the finder, re

Re: Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2004-01-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> The attached patch to 1.3.4cvs -- suggested by Jean-Marc -- Ronald> lets LyX/Mac find additional fonts in its own application Ronald> bundle. The addFontPath code works, but does not get called by Ronald> qfont_loader::available

Re: Revised patch for LyX/Mac 1.4.0

2004-01-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> Here is a revised patch for 1.4.0 to enable compilation on Ronald> MacOS with Qt/Mac, and to include various LyX/Mac features Ronald> (double-clicking from the finder, relocatable application, and Ronald> setting the PATH for th

Fonts patch for LyX/Mac (1.3.4cvs)

2003-12-29 Thread Ronald Florence
The attached patch to 1.3.4cvs -- suggested by Jean-Marc -- lets LyX/Mac find additional fonts in its own application bundle. The addFontPath code works, but does not get called by qfont_loader::available. Instead, Qt finds fonts in the teTeX hierarchy which do the math symbols wrong. The o

Re: Revised patch for LyX/Mac 1.4.0

2003-12-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> Here is a revised patch for 1.4.0 to enable compilation on Ronald> MacOS with Qt/Mac, and to include various LyX/Mac features Ronald> (double-clicking from the finder, relocatable application, and Ronald> setting the PATH for th

Revised patch for LyX/Mac 1.4.0

2003-12-23 Thread Ronald Florence
Here is a revised patch for 1.4.0 to enable compilation on MacOS with Qt/Mac, and to include various LyX/Mac features (double-clicking from the finder, relocatable application, and setting the PATH for the application and auxiliary programs). I've incorporated Jean-Marc's suggestion of a condi

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Bruno Mathieu
My apologies for all those mistakes. Now, I've read the entire README and the files in the development/Code_rules directory ;-) I've send that patch mostly for the idea of inserting the X selection into a table, because it could be useful for inserting columns of numbers for example. But I think

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Andre> I am not sure this should go in 1.3.0 though and I am not sure >> Andre> I am happy about the amount of code needed to implement this >> Andre> feature, though... >> >> I do

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> I am not sure this should go in 1.3.0 though and I am not sure > Andre> I am happy about the amount of code needed to implement this > Andre> feature, though... > > I do not want yet another feature to do what we can al

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:41:31PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> If you want to insert a tab-spearated file in a table, here is how >> you can do: create a new table, place the cursor in the first cell >> (not in the

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:41:31PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If you want to insert a tab-spearated file in a table, here is how you > can do: create a new table, place the cursor in the first cell (not > in the cell (red frame) but in the extra position on the left, and > then do Paste E

Re: Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bruno" == Bruno Mathieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruno> Oups, sorry ! Here is the dirty patch. If you want to insert a tab-spearated file in a table, here is how you can do: create a new table, place the cursor in the first cell (not in the cell (red frame) but in the extra position on

Fwd: Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-06 Thread Bruno Mathieu
Oups, sorry ! Here is the dirty patch. -- Bruno -- Message transmis -- Subject: Re: Patch for Lyx Date: 05 Jan 2003 20:36:44 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) To: Bruno Mathieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruno Mathieu <[EMAIL

Re: Patch for Lyx

2003-01-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bruno Mathieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Happy new Year, LyX Team !!! | | Here is a dirty (cut & paste ) patch for inserting the X selection as a table. | My brother needed that, maybe somone else too ? Perhaps. Thanks. But we really need the patch as well :-) And please send it to [EMAIL

Re: Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:25:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So how come LyX oly uses ios and never ios_base? I'll stick to ios for > simplicity. g++ 2.95.2's standard library has no ios_base. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Lars> | Lars> Use of ios::binary should be ok. (but I guess it really Lars> should | Lars> be ios_base::binar

Re: Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-22 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:10:16PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kayvan> Huh. > > Kayvan> I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on > Kayvan> Cygwin 1.3.6. > > Kayvan> I wonder what the difference is? >

Re: Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kayvan> Huh. Kayvan> I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on Kayvan> Cygwin 1.3.6. Kayvan> I wonder what the difference is? Most of these patches are included in 1.2.0cvs. My intent is to have all necessary stu

Re: Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-22 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Huh. I never had to do any of this to get it to compile and run on Cygwin 1.3.6. I wonder what the difference is? ---Kayvan On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote: > Attached is my patch against the sources to make Lyx running on Win32 using >

Patch for Lyx on Win32/Cygnus

2002-01-22 Thread Claus Hentschel
Attached is my patch against the sources to make Lyx running on Win32 using the Cygwin environment (release 1.3.6). Maybe someone is interested and this patch will be included in future releases. Some remarks to that patch: 1) lib/configure.m4 wasn't part of the sources tarball. I've picked that

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-09 Thread Bruce Foster
> > "Bruce" == Bruce Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Bruce> After applying the patch and rerunning the configuration, the >Bruce> compile still fails in fmt.C: > >Have you run autoconf? > >JMarc At that time, I was working with an incomplete patch and also had not run autoconf. With Al

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bruce" == Bruce Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce> After applying the patch and rerunning the configuration, the Bruce> compile still fails in fmt.C: Have you run autoconf? JMarc

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bruce" == Bruce Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce> After applying the patch and rerunning the configuration, the Bruce> compile still fails in fmt.C: Could somebody try to compile on HP-UX from the latest cvs? JMarc

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-06 Thread Bruce Foster
After applying the patch and rerunning the configuration, the compile still fails in fmt.C: /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../../boost -I/opt/local/include -D_HPUX_SOURCE -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -c fmt.C g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.

Re: HP-UX 10.20 patch for lyx 1.1.6fix1

2001-02-06 Thread lyx-devel
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:21:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "lyx-devel" == lyx-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > lyx-devel> After building and installing, executing lyx gives: > lyx-devel> /usr/lib/dld.sl: Call to mmap() failed - TEXT > lyx-devel> /opt/TWWfsw/libxforms/lib/

  1   2   >