On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Especially not for stuff that is main tasks for the next development
> round.
hmm. This would mean you would have to accept patches that are not
perfect.
I've tried to look for ways to do the Andre thing of small gradual
cha
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So perhaps we should make a branch now yes. Especially as I appear to
| have exhausted my supply of 1.2 bugfixes...
>
| I expect the branch will last 6 months or so before the interfaces are
| good enough to hit the main tree but I suppose that depends on
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:59:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure it is. This stuff _should_ go in a branch. Then we can hack away
> happily.
Yeah but I don't want to spend ages merging. You had enough trouble with
that during MVC branch, from the sounds of it.
Of course the branch will h
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 3:41 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:50:41PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Along the same lines, can you try my BufferView_pimpl.C patch in your
tree
> > "proposed cursor patch try 2". Presumably those fl_set_cursor calls
should
> > become cal
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:50:41PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Along the same lines, can you try my BufferView_pimpl.C patch in your tree
> "proposed cursor patch try 2". Presumably those fl_set_cursor calls should
> become calls to a new WorkArea method?
I suspect so, but I'm not sure what
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:47:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yup.
OK
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 2:42 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > These are the changes I have in my tree now:
> >
> > Index: PainterBase.C
>
> I can't help but think that you committed this thoroughly
> cosmetic patch just to mak
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I can't help but think that you committed this thoroughly
| cosmetic patch just to make my life harder.
Yup.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> These are the changes I have in my tree now:
>
> Index: PainterBase.C
I can't help but think that you committed this thoroughly
cosmetic patch just to make my life harder.
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting abou
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes. In this case I think that the helper function isn't a help.
I have yet another patch for you too look at, the thing missing now is
to get rid of the XChar2b stuff. We want to use wchar_t in interfaces.
(and if wchar_t is not supported, then we sho
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:55 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | | On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:25 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Index: Painter.h
> >>> ===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:25 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> Index: Painter.h
>>> ===
>>> private:
>>> + /// For the figin
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:25 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Index: Painter.h
>> ===
>> private:
>> +/// For the figinset
>> +PainterBase & pixmap(int x, int y, int w, int
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:25 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Index: Painter.h
> ===
> private:
> + /// For the figinset
> + PainterBase & pixmap(int x, int y, int w, int h, Pixmap bitmap);
> +
Errr, why? Helper fu
These are the changes I have in my tree now:
Index: PainterBase.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/PainterBase.C,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 PainterBase.C
--- PainterBase.C 30 Jul 2001 11:55:
15 matches
Mail list logo
