On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Especially not for stuff that is main tasks for the next development > round.
hmm. This would mean you would have to accept patches that are not perfect. I've tried to look for ways to do the Andre thing of small gradual changes but I can't see an easy way: there will always be some point where a big fat patch has to happen as far as I can see. But then, I'm lame... john -- I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be forever marked as such.
