Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> - Juergen's optimisation work on Natbib (is it in yet?)
It's in trunk, yes. Not yet in 1.4.x, though.
Jürgen
Georg Baum a écrit :
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I thought there had been file format changes which we want to avoid in
subminor releases.
No file format changes have happened yet.
So what about listing some of the 1.5svn new feature/optimization and
see if there's enough to justify a release, of
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I thought there had been file format changes which we want to avoid in
> subminor releases.
No file format changes have happened yet.
Georg
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> >> I noticed that the 1.4 environment has already diverged quite a lot from
> >> 1.5, so this needs to get some thorough testing of its own. E.g.,
> >> non-numbered headers are _not_ part of the ToC here.
> >
> >
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I noticed that the 1.4 environment has already diverged quite a lot from
1.5, so this needs to get some thorough testing of its own. E.g.,
non-numbered headers are _not_ part of the ToC here.
IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some additional
features al
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Same here. But Lars has a personal tree on this, which looks sort-of
| impressive. Why not just put this into trunk after 1.4.2 is out? How
| functional is it?
Huh? Have you had a look at it? Far from impressive...
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some additional
| > features already so we should keep this feature as 1.5 and release it
| > sooner than later. As far as I know, 1
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some additional
> features already so we should keep this feature as 1.5 and release it
> sooner than later. As far as I know, 1.5 is as stable as 1.4 if not
> stabler. But we c
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Well, we could well decide to do unicode in 1.6 as I don't see anything
> happening in trunk as of now. My point is that 1.5 is very nice as it is
> and users deserves it. It unicode is going to destabilize trunk for a
> year o
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:28:18PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Well, we could well decide to do unicode in 1.6 as I don't see anything
> > happening in trunk as of now. My point is that 1.5 is very nice as it is
> > and users deserves it.
>
> If that is really the case, it should be releas
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:26 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Well, we could well decide to do unicode in 1.6 as I don't see anything
>> happening in trunk as of now. My point is that 1.5 is very nice as it is
>> and users deserves it.
>
> If that is really the case, it s
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:26 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Abdelrazak> IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some
> > Abdelrazak> additional features already so we should kee
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some
Abdelrazak> additional features already so we should keep this feature
Abdelrazak> as 1.5 and release it sooner than later. As far as I know,
Abdelrazak> 1.5 is as
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:49:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Committed to trunk:
Martin> Outlining improvements/fixes
Do you t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some
Abdelrazak> additional features already so we should keep this feature
Abdelrazak> as 1.5 and release it sooner than later. As far as I
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:49:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Martin> Committed to trunk:
> >
> > Martin> Outlining improvements/fixes
> >
> > Do
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Committed to trunk:
>
> Martin> Outlining improvements/fixes
>
> Do you think the corresponding 1.4 patch could go in for 1.4.2?
I would have t
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Committed to trunk:
Martin> Outlining improvements/fixes
Do you think the corresponding 1.4 patch could go in for 1.4.2? Or are
there things that are not ready for public consumption?
JMarc
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
this file or is it something I can do myself?
You can do that yourself (and should
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Georg Baum a écrit :
> >Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >>I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
> >>this file or is it something I can do myself?
> >
> >You can do that yourself (and should have do
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
...
> >Attached. This will go in soon unless somebody spots a problem.
>
> It looks good to me. Good job.
Committed to trunk:
Outlining improvements/fixes
* LyXAction.C
(LyXAc
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum a écrit :
You can do that yourself (and should have done when you added it):
Sorry boss.
I am fortunately not the boss :-) In case I sounded rude: That was not
intended at all, it should have been just a friendly reminder.
No PB, I
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Georg Baum a écrit :
>> You can do that yourself (and should have done when you added it):
>
> Sorry boss.
I am fortunately not the boss :-) In case I sounded rude: That was not
intended at all, it should have been just a friendly reminder.
Georg
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
this file or is it something I can do myself?
Why not write a little script to clean up line endings before you commit and
just get used to using it?
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
> this file or is it something I can do myself?
Why not write a little script to clean up line endings before you commit and
just get used to using it?
dos2unix.sed:
/^M$//
u
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
this file or is it something I can do myself?
You can do that yourself (and should have done when you added it):
Sorry boss.
svn propset svn:eol-style native TocBackend.h
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I'll do that. Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
> this file or is it something I can do myself?
You can do that yourself (and should have done when you added it):
svn propset svn:eol-style native TocBackend.h TocBackend.C
svn commit TocBackend.h
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
PS will somebody please get rid of the ^M in TocBackend.h!
I'll do that.
done in TocBackend.[Ch]
Georg, maybe it's a good idea to set the svn-eol thing on
this file or is it something I can do myself?
Abdel.
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:56 +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:07 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> 1) unnumbered sections will be transformed into a numbered
Abdelrazak> sect
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:56 +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:07 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Abdelrazak> 1) unnumbered sections will be transformed into a numbered
> > Abdelrazak> section i
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:07 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Abdelrazak> 1) unnumbered sections will be transformed into a numbered
> Abdelrazak> section if you use IN and OUT.
>
> This is probably a consequence of a cha
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Yes we should do that. I propose that Martin commit his
Abdelrazak> patch (maybe minus the nested switch in LFUN_etc) and I'll
Abdelrazak> see what I can do if Martin does not have time to do it.
Yes.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> 1) unnumbered sections will be transformed into a numbered
Abdelrazak> section if you use IN and OUT.
This is probably a consequence of a change we did to layout files
recently. Now unnum
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:47 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Martin> Should be strai
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> 1) unnumbered sections will be transformed into a numbered
Abdelrazak> section if you use IN and OUT.
This is probably a consequence of a change we did to layout files
recently. Now unnumbered sections in many layout
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:46:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? Fo
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? For now.
>>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:46:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
> > Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? For now
hum...
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
But that would lead to quite some duplication of code.
Are you sure? The switch cases in toc::outline() seems pretty
self-contained for me.
The switch cases _seem_ pretty self-contained _to_ me.
Sure but I not am sure "outline" is the correct name for man
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:04 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
Martin> LFUN_OUTLIN
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:04 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
> >> Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? For now.
Sure why not.
Martin> To make sure we have a valid curso
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:40 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
> Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? For now.
>
> Sure why not.
>
> Martin> To make sure we have a valid cursor afte
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
[...]
+void outline(OutlineOp mode, Buffer * buf, pit_type & pit)
+{
+ ParagraphList & pars = buf->text().paragraphs();
Why not pass a cursor directly? What is th
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Should be straightforward. What about
Martin> LFUN_OUTLINE_{UP|DOWN|IN|OUT}? For now.
Sure why not.
Martin> To make sure we have a valid cursor after the doc change?
That is probably true indeed.
>> IMHO, at least the last po
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >>"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > + case LFUN_OUTLINE: {
> > + lyx::toc::OutlineOp const op =
> > +
> > static_cast(convert(cmd.ar
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
+ case LFUN_OUTLINE: {
+ lyx::toc::OutlineOp const op =
+
static_cast(convert(cmd.argument));
+ lyx::toc::outline(op, buffer_, cursor_.pit());
So thi
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Then you want this patch. Has the inside-inset crash fixed and
Martin> outlining buttons disabled for non-ToC. Abdel claims that
Martin> there should still be a crash in this (related to "illegal"
Martin> counters like 1.0.5).
T
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:07:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> No it isn't. I suppose you can take all outline-related
> Martin> patches with my name on it, plus lower-case some occurrences
> Martin> of Outline.
>
>
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:28 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> > Attached, trying to take into account discussions since.
> >
> > OK to commit? No document format change, and I don't expect the user
> > base will want to wait until 1.5 ;-)
>
> Martin, please have a look
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
Attached, trying to take into account discussions since.
OK to commit? No document format change, and I don't expect the user
base will want to wait until 1.5 ;-)
Martin, please have a look at the new ControlToc::canOutline() method.
Im 1.5svn you get a crash if you t
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached, trying to take into account discussions since.
|
| OK to commit? No document format change, and I don't expect the user
| base will want to wait until 1.5 ;-)
Applying things to 1.4.x does not depend on the user base.
IMHO it should wait.
Attached, trying to take into account discussions since.
OK to commit? No document format change, and I don't expect the user
base will want to wait until 1.5 ;-)
- Martin
Index: LyXAction.C
===
--- LyXAction.C (revision 13690)
+++
53 matches
Mail list logo
