On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > >> I noticed that the 1.4 environment has already diverged quite a lot from > >> 1.5, so this needs to get some thorough testing of its own. E.g., > >> non-numbered headers are _not_ part of the ToC here. > > > > IMHO, 1.5 has diverged too much already and have some additional > > features already so we should keep this feature as 1.5 and release it > > sooner than later. As far as I know, 1.5 is as stable as 1.4 if not > > stabler. But we can wait for tomorrow to let the flame war begin ;-) > > Well, if 1.5 has diverged too much in a particular area than we should > not backport corresponding new features. In the past, we fixed bugs in > the stable branch and backported features _only_ if they were safe. I > think we should stick with this strategy unless we want to switch to the > "extreme programming" methodology.
Actually it's a small thing. The attached includes un-numbered headers again into the ToC. - Martin
Index: article.layout =================================================================== --- article.layout (revision 13521) +++ article.layout (working copy) @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ Format 2 Input stdclass.inc -Input numarticle.inc SecNumDepth 3 TocDepth 3 Index: stdsections.inc =================================================================== --- stdsections.inc (revision 13521) +++ stdsections.inc (working copy) @@ -108,3 +108,6 @@ Style Subparagraph NextNoIndent 0 LeftMargin MM End + +Input numarticle.inc +
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
