Mike Meyer wrote:
> On the subject of making LyX use XML as a native format - please don't
> do that just because XML is the flavor of the month. Only do that if
> it buys something real. XML is mostly good as a standard for document
> interchange (it's used for lots of other things that it's not g
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Another question is, whether it is worth the effort to make LyX do this if
> good XML-to-XML transformation tools exist (do they yet?)
Depends on how you define good. But XSLT is defined, available as a C
library - with Python bin
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:58:40 +0100 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that the world and his dog appears to be moving not just to XML
> but to OpenDocument http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument, I
> wonder if we should consider going the whole hog when we move to XML?
>
> Seems
Given that the world and his dog appears to be moving not just to XML
but to OpenDocument http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument, I
wonder if we should consider going the whole hog when we move to XML?
Seems like the format is rich enough to support what we need.
--
Angus
