Mike Meyer wrote:
> On the subject of making LyX use XML as a native format - please don't
> do that just because XML is the flavor of the month. Only do that if
> it buys something real. XML is mostly good as a standard for document
> interchange (it's used for lots of other things that it's not good
> as), which doesn't seem to be useful to LyX's native format. The other
> thing it buys you is the ability to use XML tools. Unless there's one
> that provides functionality that doesn't already exist in LyX, that's
> not a win either.

The real thing that it buys us is structure. The current format is entirely
homegrown and not very robust. We can strip out a whole heap of kludgy
code and replace it with someone else's well maintained library. That
leaves us better placed to address real problems.

-- 
Angus

Reply via email to