On Monday 05 April 2004 20:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Tell me about DSL. You know, we've got the Most Modern Telco Network
> in the Known Universe(tm) over here. Which means glass fibre up to the
> kitchen sink. But no DSL.
Sad. Here in Denmark we have FiWi in the bathroom. In Finland I gues it c
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I guess there's plenty of DSL-powered kitchen sinks in norway, OTOH...
>
> I log into the sink from off-site to do the dishes all the time...
Lucky you... only 56k in italian kitchen sinks. The problem is, they ha
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I guess there's plenty of DSL-powered kitchen sinks in norway, OTOH...
I log into the sink from off-site to do the dishes all the time...
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Tell me about DSL. You know, we've got the Most Modern Telco Network
> | in the Known Universe(tm) over here. Which means glass fibre up to the
> | kitchen sink. But no DSL.
>
> And as we all know, the kitchen sink has
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Tell me about DSL. You know, we've got the Most Modern Telco Network
| in the Known Universe(tm) over here. Which means glass fibre up to the
| kitchen sink. But no DSL.
And as we all know, the kitchen sink has no need for fiber optics.
(Or is it for th
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:00:53PM +0200, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> I run Personal Edition and didn't even noticed. With a DSL
> connection it is so easy to do post install from ftp. I just used the
> CDs for the base install.
Tell me about DSL. You know, we've got the Most Modern Telco Network
in
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:52:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ... or pickes the right distribution. [And no, I am not too big a fan of
> SuSE as they don't include LaTeX + Co in the personal edition anymore...]
Some people can't pick. We were talking about academic non-technical
users. They g
On Sunday 04 April 2004 14:09, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> I spoke of
> academia in general because I meant to include those for whom a
> LaTex-based system is not *essential*, and those who have no interest in
> computing. These people will use Word, and persist in struggling with
> its inadequa
On Monday 05 April 2004 12:52, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ... or pickes the right distribution. [And no, I am not too big a fan of
> SuSE as they don't include LaTeX + Co in the personal edition anymore...]
I run Personal Edition and didn't even noticed. With a DSL connection it is so
easy to do pos
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> SuSE Pro and Knoppix come with LyX. Don't know about pybliographer, though.
I think it has not been included to the latest one or two SuSE releases
because pybliographic used the gnome1 libs while SuSE only shipped gnome 2.
In the meantime, pybliographic has been ported to
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:09:29PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:09:03PM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> > ... I spoke of academia in general because I meant to include those
> > for whom a LaTex-based system is not *essential*, and those who have
> > no interest i
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
> scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
> integrating it with bibliographic management software. None of the open
> source bibliograp
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> Jurabib is comming to LyX and that is a big step forward IMHO. I really
> don't see (undrestand) the idea of making the reference through a
> pybliographer pipe.
Janus, Pybliographer (and also other apps like sixpack) has a button "Cite"
which communicates to LyX via the
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:15:08AM +0200, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> Huh? I am pretty sure that LyX came with my SuSE ditribution together with a
> lot of LaTeX stuff. As far as I remember the same goes for Mandrake.
Red Hat doesn't distribute LyX, which is sad considering how many
people, at leas
On Sunday 04 April 2004 18:54, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Almost. From my point of view the "citing" feature is not useful since I
> cannot insert "formatted" references (in the sense of natbib/jurabib) from
> pybliographer (or any other app) via pipe.
> This is of course a LyX restriction in t
On Sunday 04 April 2004 19:09, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> I agree. There's one more problem. Linux distributions do not include
> LyX or pybliographer yet. Red Hat comes to mind. That means that
> people who are not technically skilled are expected to install these
> applications for themselves
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:09:03PM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> ... I spoke of academia in general because I meant to include those
> for whom a LaTex-based system is not *essential*, and those who have
> no interest in computing. These people will use Word, and persist in
> struggling with
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> What precisely is Pybliographer lacking? I don't know Endnote and only
> Pybliographer from years ago, so... an honest question. What's lacking
> should then be implemented in Pybliographer, LyX is not the right
> place for that. The two interface nicely, almost like a plug-
ECTED]
Cc: Nachev, Parashkev C
Subject: Re: Online bibliography support
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
> scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
> integ
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 02:09:04AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I didn't mean to offend. Sorry.
It's all right. I know you didn't.
> > All these organisations prefer LaTeX. All of them are the most
> > important places to publish if you are a Computer Scientist, Engineer or
> > Mathematician.
>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 08:00:08PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> John, you really have a penchant to step on my toes for no particular
> reason. :-)
> Hopelessly naive implies that I'm an idiot who doesn't know what's he
> talking about.
I didn't mean to offend. Sorry.
> I grant you that some
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:15:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
> > I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
> > but I know for sure that all computer sci
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
> I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
> but I know for sure that all computer scientists, mathematicians, and
> physicists I know use LaTeX. It's _THE
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
> scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
> integrating it with bibliographic management software. None of the open
> source bibliograp
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C wrote:
> It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
> scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
> integrating it with bibliographic management software. None of the open
> source bibliogra
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Nachev, Parashkev C spake thusly:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
> scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
> integrating it with bibliographic management software. None of the open
>
Hi,
It seems to me the main thing that is stopping the whole of the
scientific community switching to Lyx is the lack of an easy way of
integrating it with bibliographic management software. None of the open
source bibliographic software has the functionality of Endnote, in
particular the ability
27 matches
Mail list logo
