Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > > I've put a copy of the package here: > > > > LyX-1.5.6-2-Mac-Univ..>< > http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.5.6-2 > >-Mac-Universal.dmg> > > > > Could someone upload it to the correc

Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x

Bennett Helm wrote: > I've put a copy of the package here: > > LyX-1.5.6-2-Mac-Univ..>-Mac-Universal.dmg> > > Could someone upload it to the correct server (and let me know if I need to > change the download links)? I've uploaded it and changed

Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 15 août 08 à 16:48, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Would it make sense to apply this patch to the 1.5.6 tarball and rebuild the Mac binaries? Definitely. Bennett, I finally got to make a new Mac-binary with JMarc's gettext patch applied, and which should not hav

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I am wondering where it came from that 1.5.6 did not pick up the OS > language anymore. > > Question: > When you built that version, did you patch the official source (i.e. > removed the -I .../CoreFoundation) that came i

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Bennett Helm wrote: Thanks for taking over here. I'm back (sort of -- still too busy!) and happy for you to keep doing what you're doing. Let me know if you want me to test anything. Welcome back, hope you had a nice holiday. I am wondering where it came from that 1.5.6 did not pick up the OS

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Le 15 août 08 à 18:00, Konrad Hofbauer a écrit : > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>> Of course, the autoconf and automake versions will not match the original >>> release, >>> but I assume it will not matter. >>

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Le 15 août 08 à 18:00, Konrad Hofbauer a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Of course, the autoconf and automake versions will not match the original release, but I assume it will not matter. This was exactly my concern (plus whatever other system libraries might matter). JMarc, can I j

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Of course, the autoconf and automake versions will not match the original release, but I assume it will not matter. This was exactly my concern (plus whatever other system libraries might matter). JMarc, can I just use the official 1.5.6 tarball, apply the patch

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Le 15 août 08 à 17:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Do you create a new tarball 1.5.6-Mac (which I think would be safer), or should I do that? I wouldn't mind if you did. I'm currently quite busy. Please use the 1_5_6 tag, not current branch, since we already have s

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > Do you create a new tarball 1.5.6-Mac (which I think would be safer), or > should I do that? I wouldn't mind if you did. I'm currently quite busy. Please use the 1_5_6 tag, not current branch, since we already have some changes since 1.5.6. Jürgen

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Would it make sense to apply this patch to the 1.5.6 tarball and rebuild the Mac binaries? Just applying the patch onto the tarball wont't be enough, since the changes need to propagate into the configure scripts. Do you create a new tarball 1.5.6-Mac (which I think

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Le 15 août 08 à 16:48, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Are any further steps needed? I do not think so, but time will tell :) Would it make sense to apply this patch to the 1.5.6 tarball and rebuild the Mac binaries? Definitely. JMarc

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Are any further steps needed? > > I do not think so, but time will tell :) Would it make sense to apply this patch to the 1.5.6 tarball and rebuild the Mac binaries? Jürgen

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

OK for branch. Done. Are any further steps needed? I do not think so, but time will tell :) JMarc

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > >> I could also try to see whether the patch that was applied to gettext > >> to cure this problem could be applied to our own copy. > > > > Here is a short patch which does just that. If it works, it would be a > > safe candidate for branch (even to do 1.5.6 respins). > >

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I could also try to see whether the patch that was applied to gettext to cure this problem could be applied to our own copy. Here is a short patch which does just that. If it works, it would be a safe candidate for branch (even to do 1.5.6 respins). Looks good to m

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Installed new automake using macports (which also installed due to > dependencies its own and newer gettext, m4, autoconf, ...), and > autogen.sh (and make dist) work now. > > Next, I'll try your gettext patch. Great! JMarc

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Jürgen, Would it take a lot of time for you to create a (testing-)tar-ball of branch with this patch applied? Jürgen, No need for this anymore. Thanks to the help of JMarc I can do this by myself now. Thanks anyhow, Konrad P.S. The problem was that we need automak

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 1.6.3 - that is what came with the OS (10.4). I can try to manually install a newer version. Can I use the latest version (1.10.1)? Yes. Installed new automake using macports (which also installed due to dependencies i

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1.6.3 - that is what came with the OS (10.4). > I can try to manually install a newer version. > Can I use the latest version (1.10.1)? Yes. > Could be a consequence of the autogen-message (?): > "lib/doc/Makefile.am:246: variable `docfiles' not defi

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: configure.ac:7: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' Ouch! It looks like we actually require at least automake 1.7... What is your automake version? 1.6.3 - that is w

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Could it be that you have autoconf 2.62 installed? We require <= 2.61 in >> 1.5.x for now. 2.62 works, but causes warnings (which have been fixed >> for 1.6.0svn). > > No. I have 2.59. Do I have to tell autogen where my Q

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Could it be that you have autoconf 2.62 installed? We require <= 2.61 in 1.5.x for now. 2.62 works, but causes warnings (which have been fixed for 1.6.0svn). No. I have 2.59. Do I have to tell autogen where my Qt installation is? autogen.sh (export from today's bran

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would it take a lot of time for you to create a (testing-)tar-ball of > branch with this patch applied? > > Despite the instructions given on the wiki I did not manage to do that > by myself, last time I tried (something with autogen did not work > out)

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Jürgen, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I could also try to see whether the patch that was applied to gettext to cure this problem could be applied to our own copy. Here is a short patch which does just that. If it works, it would be a safe candidate for branch (even to do 1.5.6 respins). Would

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

> I could also try to see whether the patch that was applied to gettext > to cure this problem could be applied to our own copy. Here is a short patch which does just that. If it works, it would be a safe candidate for branch (even to do 1.5.6 respins). JMarc Index: m4/gettext.m4 ===

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Joost Verburg wrote: The internal gettext currently doesn't compile on Windows. So we cannot use features that are not available in the external gettext on Windows (version 0.15). Don't worry - the Mac does not call for a newer feature, just for a gettext bug fixed on the Mac-specific build o

Re: [Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Ultimately the choice is Juergen's to make, but upgrading gettext is not difficult. The only problem is that we would have to remember all the steps that were needed for trunk. All in all, it is not a very nice prospect. The internal gettext currently doesn't compile on W

[Fwd: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x]

FYI, and to bring it back onto the list. /Konrad Original Message Subject: Re: Newer Gettext for 1.5.x Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:15:32 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Konrad Hofbauer <[