On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:11:29PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >*shrug*
> >
> >I still wouldn't mind a single big chunk.
> >
> >
> But I don't have a single chunk. Some parts of my former work got lost,
> because Abdel moved code from one file to another. Other CT code
Michael Gerz wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
*shrug*
I still wouldn't mind a single big chunk.
But I don't have a single chunk. Some parts of my former work got lost,
because Abdel moved code from one file to another.
Man, I have warned you multiple times ;-)
More seriously I had the impress
Andre Poenitz wrote:
*shrug*
I still wouldn't mind a single big chunk.
But I don't have a single chunk. Some parts of my former work got lost,
because Abdel moved code from one file to another. Other CT code hasn't
even been fixed in my branch (due to a lack of time at that time).
All I
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:09:30PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I finally synchronized my branch with the trunk. The result is something
> that certainly will not work and cannot be committed in one chunk.
>
> Now how can I proceed?
>
> Actually, I will go through the same
Michael Gerz wrote:
To give you an impression of what I am going to do, here comes a first
patch. It changes two variables in conformance to the LyX coding rules
and - on that occasion - fixes a couple of places and adds FIXME
markers to a couple of other places. If I am not allowed to do such
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Michael> When I started to relabel a few variables, I noticed that
Michael> many of their uses will be removed in the long run. If I am
Michael> able to remove their use instantly (breaking CT sooner than
Michael> later), this will make thing much easier for me.
Why
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> So I am free to break things as long as only CT is affected?
Michael> Fine!
This is not exactly what I had in mind... And I do not have much say
about what should happen in 1.5 (meaning: I am not the one to give a
"go ahead and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Michael> Actually, I will go through the same process that I went
Michael> through a few month ago: I will pick those parts of the
Michael> complete patch first that are purely cosmetic, do not change
Michael> semantics, or which somehow describe a logical piece of co
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Actually, I will go through the same process that I went
Michael> through a few month ago: I will pick those parts of the
Michael> complete patch first that are purely cosmetic, do not change
Michael> semantics, or which somehow
Hello everybody,
I finally synchronized my branch with the trunk. The result is something
that certainly will not work and cannot be committed in one chunk.
Now how can I proceed?
Actually, I will go through the same process that I went through a few
month ago: I will pick those parts of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
