On 2015-10-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:27:29PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> There are some more "easyfix" patches in the pipeline:
...
>> and a symbols-invdiameter.patch:
>> diff --git a/lib/symbols b/lib/symbols
>> index 89fc41a..992f556 100644
>> --- a/lib/sym
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:27:29PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:18:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >> I realised that this not only applies to compilation with Xe/LuaTeX which
> >> is a good thing -- it also catches cases l
On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:18:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I realised that this not only applies to compilation with Xe/LuaTeX which
>> is a good thing -- it also catches cases like small letters missing in
>> most math-script fonts (To fix the descri
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:18:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> I realised that this not only applies to compilation with Xe/LuaTeX which
> is a good thing -- it also catches cases like small letters missing in
> most math-script fonts (To fix the description in lib/RELEASE-NOTES, just
> trim the
Dear Scott, dear LyX team,
On 2015-10-10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 08:23:03PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Please consider Ticket #9744: "allow parallel configuration of TeX and
>> non-TeX fonts"
>> Try "View>PDF (XeTeX)" with the LyX manuals to see why this is
>> impor
Le 12/10/15 11:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
2. What are the bugs that should be fixed before we release 2.2.0?
Please note which of these bugs are regressions. Please note also if you
are volunteering to work on the bug yourself.
I have a bug (just created for the record) on my plate abou
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:45:28AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 01:57 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >I was only curious whether there is a chance to see epub support landing
> >or no (not that I can work on it on my own). Richard?
>
> Not enough time at the moment, I'm afraid. This can go
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51:29AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 06:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7790 : a layout format change. This is about
> >>custom TOCs in the outliner and navigation menu, e.g. lists of "Sweawe",
> >>"TODO" and "FIXME" inse
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:02:08AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have a bug (just created for the record) on my plate about horizontal
> scrolling:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9796
Yes would be nice to fix this.
> Problem with tex2lyx and comments. This is a regression in 2.1 wrt 2
On 10/10/2015 06:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7790 : a layout format change. This is about
custom TOCs in the outliner and navigation menu, e.g. lists of "Sweawe",
"TODO" and "FIXME" insets (recent new modules), and it is apparently very
easy to do. There is a de
On 10/10/2015 01:57 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
I was only curious whether there is a chance to see epub support
landing or no (not that I can work on it on my own). Richard?
Not enough time at the moment, I'm afraid. This can go mid-cycle. It's
mostly python stuff.
Richard
Le 10/10/2015 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
that could not be reproduced (Guillaume, I think you had one recently?
[1]), but these seem to be the norma
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:52:06AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 10/10/2015 23:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:50:59PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9362 : the problem has been quite precisely
> >>identified, a decision has to be t
Le 10/10/2015 23:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:50:59PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9362 : the problem has been quite precisely
identified, a decision has to be taken. Even if it is just "let's warn the
users".
Can you start a separate
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 08:23:03PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Scott, dear LyX team,
>
> On 2015-10-10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > 3. What features would you like to still implement for 2.2? Which of
> > these features could not be put off for a 2.2.x release (e.g. requires a
> > format
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:50:59PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 10/10/2015 05:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >
> >1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
> >soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
> >that could not be reproduced
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:57:55AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > 1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
> > soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
> > that could not be reproduced (Guillaume, I think you had o
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> I'll probably try to finish 7404, since it is almost done.
OK.
> There are several bugs with the fileformat keyword, mainly the several
> insets that store LaTeX (e.g. 2751, 4595). IMHO they should not delay the
> release, and it is
Dear Scott, dear LyX team,
On 2015-10-10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 3. What features would you like to still implement for 2.2? Which of
> these features could not be put off for a 2.2.x release (e.g. requires a
> format change)?
Unfortunately, my knowledge of C++ and the LyX code is too limited
Le 10/10/2015 05:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
that could not be reproduced (Guillaume, I think you had one recently?
[1]), but these seem to be the norm
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
> soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
> that could not be reproduced (Guillaume, I think you had one recently?
> [1]), but these seem to be the normal amount to me, so
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 1. Do you agree that the master branch is stable and that we should move
> soon towards releasing an alpha? I saw a couple of reports of crashes
> that could not be reproduced (Guillaume, I think you had one recently?
> [1]), but these seem to be the normal amount to me, s
Dear LyX team,
There seems to be agreement that we should begin the process of the next
major release, LyX 2.2. At this point I would like to start a discussion
about the current stability of our master branch, and I would like to
ask if you have work you hope to still accomplish for 2.2.
1. Do y
23 matches
Mail list logo
