On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > I'll probably try to finish 7404, since it is almost done.
OK. > There are several bugs with the fileformat keyword, mainly the several > insets that store LaTeX (e.g. 2751, 4595). IMHO they should not delay the > release, and it is not trivial, so I'd suggest to remove the milestone for > these. I agree. If anyone is interested in working on them, please give a signal. > The list with 2.2.0 target is too long, it is unrealistic to fix all these. > IMHO we should remove the 2.2.0 milestone for all bugs we do not plan to > work on, otherwise the milestone is useless. I agree. I will start to do this (and anyone else is most welcome to help as well). I wanted to wait a bit after this thread to allow people to state their intentions to work on some bugs before I removed the milestone. > > 3. What features would you like to still implement for 2.2? Which of > > these features could not be put off for a 2.2.x release (e.g. requires a > > format change)? I know it is hard to estimate, but how long do you think > > it would take for you to implement each of your proposed features? > > None. > > I think the area that needs most work is the documentation, and I guess Uwe > could use some help. Uwe, do you have an idea how others could help to > reduce your workload? +1 Scott
