Re: Model for next releases

Benjamin Piwowarski schreef op 7-5-2014 10:52: On 30 Apr 2014 at 16:01:44 , Richard Heck (rgh...@lyx.org ) wrote: On 04/29/2014 12:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > So my proposal for the next release would be that we let things to evolve in > it's usual chaotic way and in the

Re: Model for next releases

On 30 Apr 2014 at 16:01:44 , Richard Heck (rgh...@lyx.org) wrote: On 04/29/2014 12:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > So my proposal for the next release would be that we let things to evolve in > it's usual chaotic way and in the moment there is a feeling in the community > that release is due, we

Re: Model for next releases

On 04/29/2014 12:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: So my proposal for the next release would be that we let things to evolve in it's usual chaotic way and in the moment there is a feeling in the community that release is due, we try to push someone active at that time to take the responsibility (perhaps

Re: Model for next releases (was: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1)

Pavel Sanda wrote: > I don't think this is not matter of forgetting/transparency. I agree with you this is not matter -> this is a matter

Model for next releases (was: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > blame you for this because we all are to blame here. We should start to > write down how we want to release that it becomes more transparent and that > we don't forget about that for the next release. Uwe, I don't think this is not matter of forgetting/transparency. I agree w