Benjamin Piwowarski schreef op 7-5-2014 10:52:
On 30 Apr 2014 at 16:01:44 , Richard Heck (rgh...@lyx.org
<mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>) wrote:
On 04/29/2014 12:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> So my proposal for the next release would be that we let things to
evolve in
> it's usual chaotic way and in the moment there is a feeling in the
community
> that release is due, we try to push someone active at that time to
take the
> responsibility (perhaps the one who screams most ;)
>
> What do others think about that?
I think that's a good idea: Figure out when it is time for the work to
be done who should do it.
Seems good. Also, maybe it would be a good idea for the next freezes
to leave the master branch as the development (no change) and use e.g.
a stable-2.2 branch for the stable code. I think this led to some
confusion.
Benjamin
People don't want that either. They appear to be used to freezing master
and any change is confusing.
Vincent
