On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> If it is something important, I'd probably try to make sure it works
> out-of-the-box, if not, than not.
I might even be tempted to try it out then ...
john
--
"It's a cardboard universe ... and if you lean too hard against it, y
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:20:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Unless you can tell me a way of generating the latex string
> as $ \displaystyle ... $ in the first place rather than generating
> \[ ... \] and then changing the delimiters?
It is ok like that. Everything else is probably more messy
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 17 October 2002 4:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Thanks for the feedback :-)
>>
>> Ok. Looks really good.
>
| Then I'll commit it as it cannot break anything and makes
| nav
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:56:06AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, it's getting nasty...
>
> Indeed. Should I just revert?
Probably not the worst idea.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Friday 18 October 2002 9:53 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:43:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > This is bug #680 filed on bugzilla last night by Herbert:
> > ===
> > With the latest patches the math-preview is wrong when
> > havin
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:43:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is bug #680 filed on bugzilla last night by Herbert:
> ===
> With the latest patches the math-preview is wrong when
> having a split environment, which can not be inside
> a $ ... $, which
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback :-)
Ok. Looks really good.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Thursday 17 October 2002 7:06 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > e:
> > > André suggests putting preview.dtx and associated
> > > README.preview under lib/tex. Good idea or should we just
> > > tell the users where to get it?
> >
> > Th
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What do you lot, the pseudo-users think?
>
> Thanks for the feedback :-)
No negative feedback at least.
> Attached is a small lyx file together with a small patch that
> does as I suggested above. Try out the previews with and
>
On Thursday 17 October 2002 4:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback :-)
>
> Ok. Looks really good.
Then I'll commit it as it cannot break anything and makes
navigation a lot cleaner.
Lars? Ok?
Unless you can tell
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> e:
> > André suggests putting preview.dtx and associated
> > README.preview under lib/tex. Good idea or should we just tell
> > the users where to get it?
>
> The question basically is how much we value that feature.
>
> If it is
On Thursday 17 October 2002 3:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Attached is a small lyx file together with a small patch
> > that does as I suggested above. Try out the previews with
> > and without this patch. Does the patch not make i
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:12:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a small lyx file together with a small patch that
> does as I suggested above. Try out the previews with and
> without this patch. Does the patch not make it easier to navigate
> the document?
Aehm. Do we distribute a pre
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André suggests putting preview.dtx and associated
> README.preview under lib/tex. Good idea or should we just tell
> the users where to get it?
The question basically is how much we value that feature.
If it is something important
On Thursday 17 October 2002 3:58 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Here it is.
>
> What about putting this under lib/tex?
>
> Andre'
André suggests putting preview.dtx and associated
README.preview under lib/tex. Good idea or should we j
On Monday 14 October 2002 3:26 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I played some more with this. It transpires that fleqn does
> not, after all, enable me to position the preview in the same
> place on the LyX screen as the editable view. LaTeX still
> retains the concept of a page width and all that happe
I played some more with this. It transpires that fleqn does not,
after all, enable me to position the preview in the same place
on the LyX screen as the editable view. LaTeX still retains the
concept of a page width and all that happens is that the
equation is positioned differently within thi
On Friday 11 October 2002 2:30 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is there a LaTeX way to do:
> if (loaded fleqn)
> \mathindent 0em
Already resolved:
\ifx\mathindent\undefined \else \mathindent=0em \fi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:22:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My first question is about the mechanics of this solution. Can I
> use the fleqn option with any document class?
I don't know.
> My second question is should I make this change?
Yes, why not.
[I still consider the preview featur
You may have noticed that previews of equations in display style
have a large amount of embedded space to the left of the
equation. This means that, when switching from preview mode to
edit mode, the user gets a nasty jump in his view of the
equation.
I've been chatting with David Kastrup abo
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> My first question is about the mechanics of this solution. Can
Angus> I use the fleqn option with any document class?
At worst, it will do nothing. Would that be a problem for you?
JMarc
On Friday 11 October 2002 1:20 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> My first question is about the mechanics of this
> solution. Can Angus> I use the fleqn option with any document
> class?
>
> At worst, it will do nothing. Would t
22 matches
Mail list logo
