Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> What problems do you have with collapsed figures? Every document I've
> ever edited with figures in I've had them collapsed so I can concentrate
> on the text (admitted they get opened occasionally but I know what the
> figure is
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I seems that it _could_ be a real PITA if there is no 'uncollapse all'
> button in the the Document area. Also, do collapsed portions print? I
> run into this problem with .eps graphics.
We currently have an open all floats menu entry (or at least we d
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Personally, I don't see why a float should be collapsible.
>
> Think of fan-fold paper. The pictures and tables you have defined and
> don't care about are coll
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Well, it works like a collapsable inset, like figs, notes, etc. Why don't
> > > you like it?
[...]
> > Btw, I don't really like the completely collapsable insets either, I'd
> > rather see
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Well, it works like a collapsable inset, like figs, notes, etc. Why don't
> > you like it?
>
> If you open a document after some time an start working on it you have no
> clue whatsoever which of your 234 macro definitions was the
> Well, it works like a collapsable inset, like figs, notes, etc. Why don't
> you like it?
If you open a document after some time an start working on it you have no
clue whatsoever which of your 234 macro definitions was the shortcut to
\hat{v}+\sqrt{#1}. And opening the insets one by one is anno
> It seems that macros are rendered properly now.
On paper, yes. Not on screen though...
> Check the attached file: the formula should be E[X-E[X]] but it is
> displayed as E[X ] Note that this bug exists before the mathed cleanup
> begun, but it will be nice to fix it.
Certainly. I think we wi
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> - It would be nice to change the way InsetFormulaMacro is drawn on screen:
> Instead of displaying the macro name and showing the macro body when
> the inset is opened, both the name and the body should be displayed all the
> time.
Well, it works like a co
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It seems that macros are rendered properly now.
| However, the cursor jump randomly when inserting a macro instance, and using
| subscript in the macro argument.
what do you think we are working on...
|
| More issues:
|
| - A macro instance inside an i
It seems that macros are rendered properly now.
However, the cursor jump randomly when inserting a macro instance, and using
subscript in the macro argument.
More issues:
- A macro instance inside an instance of the same macro is not displayed
correctly. Check the attached file: the formula shou
> | I just compiled current CVS and although the one-line-patch against
> | formulamacro.C is contained, math macros do _not_ work.
>
> In what way? they seem to work ok here.
Oempf... in a very limited way... macros from John's thesis were gone, but
I probably saved them without macros before..
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I just compiled current CVS and although the one-line-patch against
| formulamacro.C is contained, math macros do _not_ work.
In what way? they seem to work ok here.
Lgb
I just compiled current CVS and although the one-line-patch against
formulamacro.C is contained, math macros do _not_ work.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
