Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

2000-01-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Roland" == Ing Roland Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Maybe we need a similar set of lyxrc variables to printing for our >> viewing: \view_dvi_paper_flag, \view_ps_paper_flag and a couple of >> others. Roland> Something like this should be fairly easy to implement from Roland> what

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

2000-01-12 Thread Dr. Ing. Roland Krause
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > Does yap have a different parameter for setting paper size or none at all? Afaik it does not have a paper parameter, though its Open Source and someone could get the idea to implement one. I just dont really know what this is for at all. Isnt the paper si

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

2000-01-12 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote: > \view_dvi_command "yap `cygpath -w $$FName`" > > in your .lyxrc file. > I also got rid of the -paper option when the dvi command contains yap > although that is bad now that I think about it. > When someone names a regular document yap the -pap

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

2000-01-12 Thread Dr. Ing. Roland Krause
Jean-Marc, I finally got to it and made a patch that solves the problem of having to have extra batch files on NT for DVI previewing and PS previewing. It is now possible to specify \view_ps_command "gsview32 `cygpath -w $$FName`" and \view_dvi_command "yap `cygpath -w $$FName`" in your .lyxrc f

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

1999-12-05 Thread Shigeru Miyata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This indeed good. I'll commit this patch. However, why is it > necessary to keep the old IFS (which contain spaces) in the line Notice I don't understand shell script at all. > Is that OK with you? Yes. Now I'm inclined to agree with Arnd that the binary distributio

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

1999-12-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> which displays ThisIsLaTeX2e if \documentclass is defined. What >> happens when you run this under miktex? Where does the output go? >> Maybe is it standard error instead of std

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

1999-12-02 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > which displays ThisIsLaTeX2e if \documentclass is defined. What > happens when you run this under miktex? Where does the output go? > Maybe is it standard error instead of stdout? I think the problem is somewhere else. At least the patch below m

Re: Lyx trouble with MikTeX

1999-11-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Roland" == Ing Roland Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roland> Dear Developers, I am having some problems getting LyX to work Roland> correctly on my NT box. Roland> Problem 1 I am using MikTeX the latest stable release Roland> (www.miktex.de) but the configuration shell script insists

Lyx trouble with MikTeX

1999-11-29 Thread Dr. Ing. Roland Krause
Dear Developers, I am having some problems getting LyX to work correctly on my NT box. Problem 1 I am using MikTeX the latest stable release (www.miktex.de) but the configuration shell script insists on that latex is unusable. I have started to look into the problem but I couldnt get anywhere i