On 06/03/2013 11:35 PM, BH wrote:
Thanks, Pavel. Actually, I realize I misnamed it: it's a *window
titlebar* patch.
At any rate, it's not an important "fix", as nothing can really be
said to be broken with how things currently are. Moreover, it will
need to be checked to make sure it's not to
Thanks, Pavel. Actually, I realize I misnamed it: it's a *window titlebar*
patch.
At any rate, it's not an important "fix", as nothing can really be said to
be broken with how things currently are. Moreover, it will need to be
checked to make sure it's not too kludgey (as I indicated in my previou
On 06/03/2013 06:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
In the meantime, I would like to ask to test current master, and
report any
bugs and/or regressions.
I tested the installer for LyX 2.1-beta and noticed one potential RC
issue: The file lyxrc.defau
Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
In the meantime, I would like to ask to test current master, and report any
bugs and/or regressions.
I tested the installer for LyX 2.1-beta and noticed one potential RC issue: The file lyxrc.defaults
is created in Format 11 while the prefe
Am 03.06.2013 19:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Yes, documentation can go in.
I have put in everything that I had in my tree.
-
I prepared an installer for the beta release (current master) and from this point of view everything
works so far (quick test.)
regards Uwe
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master and I would
> like to allow in only the fixes we are waiting for, important fixes (after
> an ok from me), translations and documentation.
>
> More specifically, I'm holding the release to
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Is RELEASE-NOTES up to date? I think one of the recent changes deserve it
> to be mentioned.
This is a good point. We should highlight such menu movement maybe even in
announcement(?), IMHO this is sensitive change which will affect almost anyone
and old time users would be ann
Am 03.06.2013 20:05, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Have you looked in the Document menu ?
Not yet. It is there but strange that I missed this change. I find this a bit confusion because I
want to view the file - Hmm but the document menu also makes sense. I think such important menu
change
Op 3-6-2013 19:33, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master
Sorry for my commit, saw it too late.
However, there is a release blocker in my opinion: the View->Format
menus are no longer there. So I
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013 um 19:33:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
> > As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master
>
> Sorry for my commit, saw it too late.
>
> However, there is a release blocker in my opinion: the View->Format men
Op 3-6-2013 19:33, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master
Sorry for my commit, saw it too late.
However, there is a release blocker in my opinion: the View->Format
menus are no longer there. So I
Am 03.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master
Sorry for my commit, saw it too late.
However, there is a release blocker in my opinion: the View->Format menus are no longer there. So I
cannot view files as DVI or XeTeX anymo
Liviu is correct. And in knitr, I really do not want to support `<<>>=
xx` either, although for now, xx is ignored.
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM,
Op 3-6-2013 12:38, Liviu Andronic schreef:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
In the meantime, I would like to ask to test current master, and report any
bugs and/or regressions. I expect the above issues to be fixed early this
week. This means that we can hopefully
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 03/06/2013 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master and I
>> would like to allow in only the fixes we are waiting for, important
>> fixes (after an ok from me), t
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> - an advice on what to do for bug #8408 (use of pLatex and encodings).
If nothing happens, this needs to be reverted:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bff66b8a5a8a289dfb36bfb339e9586b3a02d51/lyxgit/lib/configure.py
The -kanji switch was implemented wrongly. Curre
03/06/2013 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Dear all,
As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master and I
would like to allow in only the fixes we are waiting for, important
fixes (after an ok from me), translations and documentation.
More specifically, I'm holding the release to
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> In the meantime, I would like to ask to test current master, and report any
> bugs and/or regressions. I expect the above issues to be fixed early this
> week. This means that we can hopefully tag the first beta release next
> weeken
Dear all,
As LyX 2.1 beta1 is closing in on us, I want to freeze master and I would
like to allow in only the fixes we are waiting for, important fixes (after
an ok from me), translations and documentation.
More specifically, I'm holding the release to wait for:
- tex2lyx part for the new chunk
19 matches
Mail list logo
