Am 07.07.2010 um 01:19 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> On 7/6/2010 5:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Stephan what is the plan about the dictionaries? do you plan to include them
>> all into the installer? 0.5 GB for each release looks quite big...
This I currently don't know. Since I reached a "milestone"
On 7/6/2010 5:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan what is the plan about the dictionaries? do you plan to include them
all into the installer? 0.5 GB for each release looks quite big...
Is this dmg uncompressed? A zip with Hunspell dictionaries for all
supported languages is only about 30 MB.
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Index: development/LyX-Mac-binary-release.sh
> ===
> --- development/LyX-Mac-binary-release.sh (Revision 34745)
> +++ development/LyX-Mac-binary-release.sh (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
> QtLibrari
Am 06.07.2010 um 10:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 5 juil. 10 à 23:32, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 05.07.2010 um 23:08 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>
>>> Sorry. Try AppleSpellChecker.mm. .m is ObjC and .mm is objC++, I think.
>>
>> It doesn't work out of the box... autoconf didn't dete
Am 06.07.2010 um 10:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 5 juil. 10 à 23:32, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 05.07.2010 um 23:08 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>
>>> Sorry. Try AppleSpellChecker.mm. .m is ObjC and .mm is objC++, I think.
>>
>> It doesn't work out of the box... autoconf didn't dete
Le 5 juil. 10 à 23:32, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 05.07.2010 um 23:08 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Sorry. Try AppleSpellChecker.mm. .m is ObjC and .mm is objC++, I
think.
It doesn't work out of the box... autoconf didn't detect the .mm
extension.
I'll continue tomorrow. In case you have a
Am 05.07.2010 um 23:08 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 5 juil. 10 à 21:26, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Another one: I couldn't manage to compile the "unified"
>> AppleSpellChecker.m...
>
> Sorry. Try AppleSpellChecker.mm. .m is ObjC and .mm is objC++, I think.
It doesn't work out of the box...
Le 5 juil. 10 à 21:26, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Another one: I couldn't manage to compile the "unified"
AppleSpellChecker.m...
Sorry. Try AppleSpellChecker.mm. .m is ObjC and .mm is objC++, I think.
JMarc
Am 05.07.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Stephan Witt writes:
>> BTW, regarding USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING...
>>
>> in lyx-devel/src/support/Package.cpp I can find:
>>
>> #if defined (USE_WINDOWS_PACKAGING)
>> # include "support/os_win32.h"
>> #endif
>> ...
>> #if defined (USE_MACOSX_PA
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
>> That would introduce an AppleSpellChecker.m file directly in directory
>> lyx-devel/src.
> That's good to know.
>
>> I had the impression they should live in lyx-devel/src/support only.
>>
> I would rather move all the spellers to src/support.
This could be a goo
Stephan Witt writes:
> BTW, regarding USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING...
>
> in lyx-devel/src/support/Package.cpp I can find:
>
> #if defined (USE_WINDOWS_PACKAGING)
> # include "support/os_win32.h"
> #endif
> ...
> #if defined (USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING)
> # include // FSFindFolder, FSRefMakePath
> #endif
>
> T
On 07/05/2010 05:32 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
Great. Is there a reason why the code is split in two files? It would be
better to have a single AppleSpellChecker.m file implementing the speller
object IMO.
Am 05.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Abdelrazak Younes writes:
>>> Great. Is there a reason why the code is split in two files? It would be
>>> better to have a single AppleSpellChecker.m file implementing the speller
>>> object IMO.
>>
>> Well, you still need to implement the
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
>> Great. Is there a reason why the code is split in two files? It would be
>> better to have a single AppleSpellChecker.m file implementing the speller
>> object IMO.
>
> Well, you still need to implement the SpellChecker virtual interface
> in a C++ file. And AFAIU, App
Am 05.07.2010 um 15:56 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Stephan Witt writes:
>>> Why not, but it is a bit fragile IMO. That would be like the Linkback
>>> support, right?
>>
>> Why would that be fragile?
>> Do you mean if USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING is true and it is not Mac OS X >=
>> 10.4?
>
> Packa
Stephan Witt writes:
>> Why not, but it is a bit fragile IMO. That would be like the Linkback
>> support, right?
>
> Why would that be fragile?
> Do you mean if USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING is true and it is not Mac OS X >=
> 10.4?
Packaging is just packaging. If we had a gnustep port, it would use this
Am 05.07.2010 um 13:54 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Stephan Witt writes:
>>> Keep this name (AppleSpell with proper casing maybe), but make sure it
>>> is the default on the mac.
>>
>> I have an idea myself for a name: "native". I don't know when it makes
>> sense for other platforms too.
>
Am 05.07.2010 um 14:10 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Index: src/support/AppleSpeller.m
>> ===
>> --- src/support/AppleSpeller.m (Revision 0)
>> +++ src/support/AppleSpeller.m (Revision 0)
>
> why has this
Am 05.07.2010 um 14:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> On 07/05/2010 01:59 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
>> Stephan Witt writes:
>>
>>> I plan to avoid additional configure checks. I think I can rely on the
>>> macro USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING.
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch to implement the feature
On 07/05/2010 01:59 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
Stephan Witt writes:
I plan to avoid additional configure checks. I think I can rely on the macro
USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING.
Attached is a patch to implement the feature for Mac OS X.
Great. Is there a reason why the code is split in t
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Index: src/support/AppleSpeller.m
> ===
> --- src/support/AppleSpeller.m(Revision 0)
> +++ src/support/AppleSpeller.m(Revision 0)
why has this file "m" extension?
> @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> +/**
> + *
Stephan Witt writes:
> I plan to avoid additional configure checks. I think I can rely on the macro
> USE_MACOSX_PACKAGING.
>
> Attached is a patch to implement the feature for Mac OS X.
Great. Is there a reason why the code is split in two files? It would be
better to have a single AppleSpellCh
Am 05.07.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES:
> Stephan Witt writes:
>
>> I've made some progress with the integration of Apples spell checking engine
>> in LyX.
>
> Great!
>
>> Basically it works here. Now I have to choose a name for it to the user.
>> "applespell" seems to similar to
Stephan Witt writes:
> I've made some progress with the integration of Apples spell checking engine
> in LyX.
Great!
> Basically it works here. Now I have to choose a name for it to the user.
> "applespell" seems to similar to "aspell" and may be the source for some
> confusion.
> Has anybody
I've made some progress with the integration of Apples spell checking engine in
LyX.
Basically it works here. Now I have to choose a name for it to the user.
"applespell" seems to similar to "aspell" and may be the source for some
confusion.
Has anybody an opinion? I couldn't come up with a bette
25 matches
Mail list logo
