Rob Oakes wrote:
> Hi all,
ha, i see you again :)
i remember you requested to be informed about python bugs -- i just found
one for you - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3605 :D
pavel
On 10/25/2009 05:20 PM, Francesco Biccari wrote:
I am a new LyX user and I have used LaTeX for about 10 years.
LyX is a powerful tool but has some drawbacks: the user has not
the complete control of the code and the used file format is "non-standard",
lyx instead of tex.
There is a very good
On 25/10/2009 22:42, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> LyX is a powerful tool but has some drawbacks: the user has not
> the complete control of the code
You can do everything with LyX that you can do with LaTeX. Do you have
an example where this is not the case?
> and the used file format is "non-standard"
Hi all,
Someone else may have pointed this out, but there are already several
prominent LaTeX "writing environments." I often use Kile (a KDE
application) precisely the way you describe and think that it is
fantastic.
But while Kile is invaluable for fine-tuning or tinkering, I find it too
compl
> LyX is a powerful tool but has some drawbacks: the user has not
> the complete control of the code
You can do everything with LyX that you can do with LaTeX. Do you have an example where this is not
the case?
> and the used file format is "non-standard",
> lyx instead of tex.
We are working
if this is a simple task but I think that a software like that
> would be the perfect compromise between LyX and typical LaTeX editors
> approach.
your specification of light lyx is quite blurry, so its difficult to react any
way.
have you tried couple of another editors, which are much more
Hello,
this is the first time I write on this mailing list.
I am a new LyX user and I have used LaTeX for about 10 years.
LyX is a powerful tool but has some drawbacks: the user has not
the complete control of the code and the used file format is "non-standard",
lyx instead of tex.
Why don't you
