Re: LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE

2008-05-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:08:46AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote: > > Am 28.05.2008 um 22:41 schrieb rgheck: > >> >> This code in MathMacroTemplate.cpp has to be wrong: >> case LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE: >> flag.enabled(); >> bre

Re: LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE

2008-05-29 Thread rgheck
Stefan Schimanski wrote: Am 28.05.2008 um 22:41 schrieb rgheck: This code in MathMacroTemplate.cpp has to be wrong: case LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE: flag.enabled(); break; That READS the flag, pointlessly. It doesn't write it. Maybe what's wanted is flag.enabled(true)? Yes, that

Re: LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE

2008-05-29 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Am 28.05.2008 um 22:41 schrieb rgheck: This code in MathMacroTemplate.cpp has to be wrong: case LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE: flag.enabled(); break; That READS the flag, pointlessly. It doesn't write it. Maybe what's wanted is flag.enabled(true)? Yes,

LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE

2008-05-28 Thread rgheck
This code in MathMacroTemplate.cpp has to be wrong: case LFUN_IN_MATHMACROTEMPLATE: flag.enabled(); break; That READS the flag, pointlessly. It doesn't write it. Maybe what's wanted is flag.enabled(true)? rh