Re: Dictionaries in Win installer

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:23:27AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > That kicks us somewhere in the region of 365*30*3*2=~66k installs per year... > Sure, especially the last two numbers are highly speculative, but you can > easily recalculate with your own constants ;) Complementary data points for li

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/04/2024 ?? 06:55, Yu Jin a écrit : > >Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > >On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > It was under svn, not git until few weeks bac

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer

Le 11/04/2024 à 06:55, Yu Jin a écrit : Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda: On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > It was under svn, not git until few weeks back when we update our infra. > Now both git or trac can be used (I used tra

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer

Le 10/04/2024 à 23:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit : BTW since I inadvertedly broke windows installs (dictionary URLs need to be fixed for new releases) and accidentally found that our trac log exploded with warnings about inexisting paths - I was able to narrow down number of unique attempts to download

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

t; this gives some approximation to ~18k win installs per year... > At least those that request a dictionary, because some common dictionaries (german, few english variants, french, spanish) are included in the installer itself so they never get requested. -- Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > It was under svn, not git until few weeks back when we update our infra. > Now both git or trac can be used (I used trac just because the conversion > patch was easier to write, but feel free to use git if you want, it's the > primary s

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Yu Jin wrote: > Yeah I just wanted to do that too, looks good, but it should also be > backported to 2.4.x and 2.4.1-devel? Already backported... > I was just searching for a reason why trac is used there in the first place > instead of https://git.lyx.or

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

-end (I already had MikTeX installed...). > > > > > > This is what didn't work so far (during installation): > > > * installation of dictionaries and thesauri in both Norwegian forms > failed (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk) > > > * installation of thesauri in US and GB

Re: Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

what didn't work so far (during installation): > > * installation of dictionaries and thesauri in both Norwegian forms failed > > (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk) > > * installation of thesauri in US and GB English failed. > > This looks like a problem in our win installer. >

Dictionaries in Win installer (was: LyX 2.4.0 & Jupyter Notebooks)

ries and thesauri in both Norwegian forms failed > (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk) > * installation of thesauri in US and GB English failed. This looks like a problem in our win installer. Eugene, do dictionaries installation work for you now? If they are not part of the package but we download them, t

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

gt; the trouble. >>>> >>> For a typical Windows user, as I could see, having such windows >>> appearing is associated with viruses. I'm not too fond of adding a message >>> to the user saying that such windows are normal, they'd tend to think that >&g

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

onsidered a hack on the web, because the embedded python is not meant > to be enhanced with more packages, but it works. With the pywin32 package > installed using that hack the imports work. But there are 2 things > resulting from the "hack": > 1. there is a bit of manual wo

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

is associated with viruses. I'm not too fond of adding a message to the >> user saying that such windows are normal, they'd tend to think that LyX is >> poorly coded. >> >> Are you able to test with and without the PyWin packages? >> > I could with a recent

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

7;d tend to think that LyX is > poorly coded. > > Are you able to test with and without the PyWin packages? > I could with a recent installer for 2.4 (these modules don't appear in the 2.3 package); I think I could just delete a bunch of files. Eugene, could you provide me with th

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On 3/11/23 20:18, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: So what would you say? Is pywin32 needed or do I skip it? Did you see my message about what this is supposed to do? Suppress certain windows

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: > > 2. The python package gets significantly larger (50MB vs 18MB unzipped) > and also the LyX installer itself when finished (65MB vs. 55MB). > > Not a big deal either. > LyX w

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

rom the "hack": 1. there is a bit of manual work to do when updating the python, I can document it though, so not a big deal. That part seems fine. 2. The python package gets significantly larger (50MB vs 18MB unzipped) and also the LyX installer itself when finished (65MB vs. 55MB

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

a way of installing pywin32 into the embeddable package, it is considered a hack on the web, because the embedded python is not meant to be enhanced with more packages, but it works. With the pywin32 package installed using that hack the imports work. But there are 2 things resulting from the "hac

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@gmail.com>: > On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : > >> all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in > >> a try-except block > > > > What do we g

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in a try-except block What do we gain when they ar present? It might be important enough to warrant having those modules.     try:    

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in a try-except block What do we gain when they ar present? It might be important enough to warrant having those modules. prefs2prefs imports also fail, but looks like prefs2prefs.py is

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am Mi., 8. März 2023 um 14:49 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > Another approach could be just collect all import lines from > all scripts in lib/scripts and check they are within that minimal > p3 install. > This sounds like a good idea, I just did that, there are quite a few imports: import os, re,

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:11:57PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > I am probably a bit late on this, but Python2 like does not exist anymore, > so I am thinking on including python 3 in the installer. I have looked at > the download page for python and found Windows embeddable package (64-bit), &

Include Python3 in the Windows installer

I am probably a bit late on this, but Python2 like does not exist anymore, so I am thinking on including python 3 in the installer. I have looked at the download page for python and found Windows embeddable package (64-bit), which is 8-10 MB small (depending on the version), I have looked into

Re: Windows installer: add version in all shortcuts

Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 23:01 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < dourou...@gmail.com>: > Hi Eugene, > > I proposed in another discussion to add the version in all shortcuts > created by the installer, for specifically the case where the user has > several versions of LyX (or j

Windows installer: add version in all shortcuts

Hi Eugene, I proposed in another discussion to add the version in all shortcuts created by the installer, for specifically the case where the user has several versions of LyX (or just updated, in which case there will be a delay before the new shortcut gets into the search cache of the Start menu

Re: [LyX/master] make distcheck broken after old installer purge.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:31:31PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit dded4c8ab548892d86480d11541ad9a350e4c450 > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Sun Jan 31 16:32:51 2021 +0100 > > make distcheck broken after old installer purge. JMarc, are you able to somehow check whether jenk

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

r. This is not because of the installer itself though, but rather because of LyX. Usually major releases bring new features and get rid of some old stuff, so a fresh "restart" is needed. The installer for 2.4 won't detect your LyX 2.3 because of that. It will also be

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

to hear this will still be supported (but I assume >>> for 2.4 it won't be possible?). >>> >> Every major release will have to be installed freshly, meaning into an >> empty folder. This is not because of the installer itself though, but >> rather because of LyX.

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

Every major release will have to be installed freshly, meaning into an empty folder. This is not because of the installer itself though, but rather because of LyX. Usually major releases bring new features and get rid of some old stuff, so a fresh "restart" is needed. T

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

g >> these lines but wanted to be sure. It is generally handy to be able to >> update so it is good to hear this will still be supported (but I assume >> for 2.4 it won't be possible?). >> > Every major release will have to be installed freshly, meaning into an >

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

o update so it is good to hear this will still be supported (but I assume for 2.4 it won't be possible?). Every major release will have to be installed freshly, meaning into an empty folder. This is not because of the installer itself though, but rather because of LyX. Usually maj

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

ssume > for 2.4 it won't be possible?). > Every major release will have to be installed freshly, meaning into an empty folder. This is not because of the installer itself though, but rather because of LyX. Usually major releases bring new features and get rid of some old stuff, so a fres

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

i., 2. Dez. 2020 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb <_johnny7_...@web.de <mailto:johnny7_...@web.de>>: Thanks for all your work and for the release of LyX 2.3.6! I was wondering how to proceed with the new installer on Windows. With former version updates it worked fine just to run the

Re: Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

Am Mi., 2. Dez. 2020 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb <_johnny7_...@web.de>: > Thanks for all your work and for the release of LyX 2.3.6! > > I was wondering how to proceed with the new installer on Windows. With > former version updates it worked fine just to run the installer and put >

LyX 2.3.6 Windows Installer

As noted in the announcement of LyX 2.3.6, there is now an updated installer available for Windows, including a 64 bit version. In order to update to 2.3.6 on Windows using the new installer, you should uninstall the previous 2.3 releases using the uninstaller or from within the control panel

Update LyX with 64-bit installer on Windows

Thanks for all your work and for the release of LyX 2.3.6! I was wondering how to proceed with the new installer on Windows. With former version updates it worked fine just to run the installer and put the new version over the old one. The new 64-bit installer does not automatically detect my

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Uhm, were we talking about portuguese - Brazil or Portuguese - Portugal? Which one to include? -- Eugene I don't know which will be better for Portuguese-speaking people, but I've meant pt_PT, since it is x3.5 smaller than pt_BR. Yuriy -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org ht

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Am Mo., 23. Nov. 2020 um 22:00 Uhr schrieb Yuriy Skalko < yuriy.ska...@gmail.com>: > > I’d propose to include the most popular languages. Russian and > Portuguese are > > part of that, definitely. > > > > Stephan > > Thanks, the question is what additional languages to include. Italian? > Swedish?

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

I’d propose to include the most popular languages. Russian and Portuguese are part of that, definitely. Stephan Thanks, the question is what additional languages to include. Italian? Swedish? Statistics for dicts downloaded from LyX SVN can be useful here (if it is available). Yuriy -- lyx

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

gt; Done. > > > > > The links have been updated in the old installer already, see > > https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11192. > > In the new one it is of course also svn from where dictionaries are > > downloaded. > > > > Well then I guess I will be also

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

> P.S. Just now checked the UserGuide manual. It is linking to > SourceForge as dictionary repository. Should we update these links? Yes. Done. The links have been updated in the old installer already, see https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11192. In the new one it is of course also sv

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

t; SourceForge as dictionary repository. Should we update these links? > > Yes. > The links have been updated in the old installer already, see https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11192. In the new one it is of course also svn from where dictionaries are downloaded. Well then I guess I will

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 11/22/20 9:17 AM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: >> Good that means careful user can get whatever dictionary he wants. >> Anyway, I don't see any problem adding the languages you proposed. >> >> Pavel > > I don't want to say that current installation process is not so good. > Just want to simplify life for

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Good that means careful user can get whatever dictionary he wants. Anyway, I don't see any problem adding the languages you proposed. Pavel I don't want to say that current installation process is not so good. Just want to simplify life for not so careful users. P.S. Just now checked the Us

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:15:00PM +0200, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > Now installer automatically selects OS language for installer UI. But user > should scroll through big language list and manually select dictionary for > the same language. If user skips this (assuming that if installer is i

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

I might be wrong but I thought that windows installer used to have list of languages that you could select to install. If that's the case wouldn't be trivial to just download dicts from our site in case use ask for specific lanugage? Or to have just single checkbox like 'Instal

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 12:16:44PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > On Windows I???m not aware of a similar infrastructure. I might be wrong but I thought that windows installer used to have list of languages that you could select to install. If that's the case wouldn't be trivial to

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Am 21.11.2020 um 21:12 schrieb Yuriy Skalko : > > The thread grown fast and in different directions, so I want to get it back > to the initial proposal. > > Taking only concrete numbers: I've proposed to include dicts for Russian and > Portuguese. Then Joel proposed to include dicts for top 25

Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

The thread grown fast and in different directions, so I want to get it back to the initial proposal. Taking only concrete numbers: I've proposed to include dicts for Russian and Portuguese. Then Joel proposed to include dicts for top 25 languages. And Stephan told that he packages 82 dicts for

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Le 31 octobre 2020 07:42:37 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >On 10/30/20 7:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 30/10/2020 à 20:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> I support this idea as well, but we've already had this debate and >>> there is considerable opposition. When there's op

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

; Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked >>>> google and >>>> > > found it pretty quickly. >>>> > > >>>> > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on >>>> Windows: >>>&

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 7:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30/10/2020 à 20:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> I support this idea as well, but we've already had this debate and >> there is considerable opposition. When there's opposition to this >> type of change, even if the majority support the change,

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/30/20 4:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:05:23PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > On 10/30/20 4:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > On 10/30/20 3:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Le 30/10/2020 à 21:24, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 30.10.2020 um 19:48 schrieb Yu Jin : These make an additional disk size of approximately 246 MB if uncompressed. Fortunately the disk image can use a HFS+ feature: the files are compressed and so it's 50 MB in package and on target systems. I don

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Le 30/10/2020 à 20:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I support this idea as well, but we've already had this debate and there is considerable opposition. When there's opposition to this type of change, even if the majority support the change, usually we don't do it since the benefit of the doubt g

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 4:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:05:23PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 4:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 3:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 3

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

t; >>> > Am Fr., 30. Okt. 2020 um 19:29 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda >> >: >>> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:19:06PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: >>> > > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked >>> google and >>> >

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

t;> > > and >> > > > found it pretty quickly. >> > > > >> > > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on >> Windows: >> > > > de_DE >> > > > en_GB >> > > > en_US >> >

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

+0100, Yu Jin wrote: >> > > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked >> google and >> > > found it pretty quickly. >> > > >> > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on >> Windows: >> >

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

These make an additional disk size of approximately 246 MB if uncompressed. Fortunately the disk image can use a HFS+ feature: the files are compressed and so it's 50 MB in package and on target systems. I don’t know if something similar is possible on windows. No, unpacked files always take th

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

mpts to work with LyX, I asked google > and > > > found it pretty quickly. > > > > > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on > Windows: > > > de_DE > > > en_GB > > > en_US > > > es_ES > > > es_MX

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

t; > > > > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on > Windows: > > > > de_DE > > > > en_GB > > > > en_US > > > > es_ES > > > > es_MX > > > > fr_FR > > > > > > Do you

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

; > > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on Windows: > > de_DE > > en_GB > > en_US > > es_ES > > es_MX > > fr_FR > > Do you have an estimate what would be the difference in installer size if we > included all dicts? >

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:05:23PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/30/20 4:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 10/30/20 3:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > On 10/30/20 3:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrot

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 4:04 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 3:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 3:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:59:45 PM WET Joel Kulesza wrote: Some didn't even th

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 3:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 10/30/20 3:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:59:45 PM WET Joel Kulesza wrote: Some didn't even think to ask the question of whether it was availabl

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Le 30 octobre 2020 19:59:45 GMT+01:00, Joel Kulesza a écrit : >Some didn't even think to ask the question of whether it was available but >once demonstrated there was an "oh wow" moment. As such, I'd be in favor >of exposing capability and letting someone then pursue how to make it stop >rather

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:26:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/30/20 3:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:59:45 PM WET Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > > > Some didn't even think to ask the question of whether it was available > > but > > > > > once de

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 3:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:59:45 PM WET Joel Kulesza wrote: > Some didn't even think to ask the question of whether it was available but > once demonstrated there was an "oh wow" moment.  As such, I'd be in favor > of exposing capability an

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

ds new dictionaries (they are actually not moving that fast). They idea was that we should use those for win installations but I do not know how is it with the current installer. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:48:39PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > > > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked google > > and > > > found it pretty quickly. > > > > > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on Wi

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:59:45 PM WET Joel Kulesza wrote: > Some didn't even think to ask the question of whether it was available but > once demonstrated there was an "oh wow" moment. As such, I'd be in favor > of exposing capability and letting someone then pursue how to make it stop > rath

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:40 AM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/30/20 12:55 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:47:58AM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote: > >> Further, I'd like to see continuous spellchecking enabled by default > >> (countless folks who I've introduced LyX to ask

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

I think this is a reasaonable idea. What do we include by default now? Riki Here are default languages: Deutsch (D) English (GB) English (US) Espanol (ES) Espanol (MX) Francais And these are always installed and cannot be unselected in installer. Maybe it will be better to select some

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Am Fr., 30. Okt. 2020 um 19:29 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:19:06PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked google > and > > found it pretty quickly. > > > > Btw. by default following dicts ar

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:19:06PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked google and > found it pretty quickly. > > Btw. by default following dicts are included in the installer on Windows: > de_DE > en_GB > en_US > es_ES

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

case it seems more wise not to break the defaults. > > Yes, that was the reason... > > Joel, did those users find it by themselves? Or were they wondering if > LyX had it at all? > Actually I remember my first attempts to work with LyX, I asked google and found it pretty quickly.

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 12:55 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:47:58AM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote: Further, I'd like to see continuous spellchecking enabled by default (countless folks who I've introduced LyX to ask why that isn't the case). Because the is another half of countless folks wh

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:47:58AM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote: > Further, I'd like to see continuous spellchecking enabled by default > (countless folks who I've introduced LyX to ask why that isn't the case). Because the is another half of countless folks who hate that by default (or at least that

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:09 AM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/30/20 5:17 AM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > > Hello LyX developers, > > > > I've tried testing installer of LyX 2.4 on Windows 10 and it works > > without any problems, thanks for preparing it. > &

Re: Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

On 10/30/20 5:17 AM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: Hello LyX developers, I've tried testing installer of LyX 2.4 on Windows 10 and it works without any problems, thanks for preparing it. After running the installer, I have proposition to include spellchecking dictionaries for Russian and Portu

Spellchecking dictionaries in LyX 2.4 installer

Hello LyX developers, I've tried testing installer of LyX 2.4 on Windows 10 and it works without any problems, thanks for preparing it. After running the installer, I have proposition to include spellchecking dictionaries for Russian and Portuguese by default into this installer. Thes

Re: Windows Installer to Test

On 6/3/20 9:50 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let

Re: Windows Installer to Test

Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am hoping to > release Th

Windows Installer to Test

I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am hoping to release Thursday. Note that there will also be installers built from Eugene's new code, but these will not be posted unti

Re: Work on Windows installer

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:02:41PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Nice work! I'm going to build the 2.3.5 tarball probably today. I'll use > the old installer for the official one, but we can release 'testing' > installers built from this code, as well (in

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 15:43 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Instead of changing strings, it should be possible to change the handling > of > the translatable strings (e.g. replace "\r\n" to "$\r$\n" on the fly) > Makes sense, why did I not think about that. I have done that now and replaced th

Re: Work on Windows installer

Nice work! I'm going to build the 2.3.5 tarball probably today. I'll use the old installer for the official one, but we can release 'testing' installers built from this code, as well (including the 64 bit binary). We can advertise those just on the lists, as we did the last t

Re: Work on Windows installer

.nsh >>> to be used by both installers. >> >> I understand the old installer will we ditched anyway after the new one >> has been sufficiently tested. > > OTOH, if we have two installers in the pre/beta phase, it is easier  > to have only one set of language fi

Re: Work on Windows installer

; >>> The duplication of language-files >>> development/Win32/packaging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh >>> vs >>> development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/*.nsh >>> >>> looks not so pleasant. Do we really have to expect different translations >>&

Re: Work on Windows installer

Le 01/06/2020 à 17:19, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: The position of these files could be development/Win32/packaging/installerCommon/lang/*.nsh to be used by both installers. I understand the old installer will we ditched

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > The position of these files could be > development/Win32/packaging/installerCommon/lang/*.nsh > to be used by both installers. I understand the old installer will we ditched anyway after the new one has been suf

Re: Work on Windows installer

ging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh > > vs > > development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/*.nsh > > > > looks not so pleasant. Do we really have to expect different translations > > in > > these directories? > > > > The translations should be

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :0 > From what I can see, the patch adds only Windows install in extra dir. > > The duplication of language-files > development/Win32/packaging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh > vs > development/Win32/packaging/in

Re: Work on Windows installer

ll in extra dir. The duplication of language-files development/Win32/packaging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh vs development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/*.nsh looks not so pleasant. Do we really have to expect different translations in these directories? Kornel pgp9Azc

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). > > Ticked created #11882 Thanks. I suspect there are not many (are there any?) people who feel competent to comment on this. I propose to go ahead and commit to master so it can

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > What if I create a Ticket on track and upload it there? > > Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). > Ticked created #11882

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > What if I create a Ticket on track and upload it there? Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 08:56 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > I think I'm finished with the new installer... I have tested a few > > obvious cases and how the installer behaves there makes sense imho. > > H

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >