On 02-Apr-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jurgen:
>
Hi Larry!
> Where is this package available? The xforms-0.88-9 you mention?
> Not from RedHat. Not from the xforms home page or its ftp site.
> Not from the LyX ftp site.
This is from RedHat-Powertools-6.x! You can also find it on
http:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If you are raising the issue of:
> bxform-088-glibc.tgz vs. bxform-088-glibc2.1.tgz,
> unfortunately the error is the same with each.
>
> bxform-089 for glibc and glibc2.1 are the same here.
>
> Redhat 7.0 is a glibc2.1 based box.
I was not raising any issue. I use
If you are raising the issue of:
bxform-088-glibc.tgz vs. bxform-088-glibc2.1.tgz,
unfortunately the error is the same with each.
bxform-089 for glibc and glibc2.1 are the same here.
Redhat 7.0 is a glibc2.1 based box.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> [EMAIL PRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It seems strange that a fresh compile of the latest xforms
> sources I could find yields the error Jurgen spoke of here,
> related to method `int stringbuf::sync ()'.
>
> Rather than try and track down some Redhat 6.x rpm, can someone
> point me to bxforms sources th
It seems strange that a fresh compile of the latest xforms
sources I could find yields the error Jurgen spoke of here,
related to method `int stringbuf::sync ()'.
Rather than try and track down some Redhat 6.x rpm, can someone
point me to bxforms sources that will compile correctly on
Redhat 7.0?
On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> and this is the clasical sympthom of a xforms rpm that is too new
> (actually it contains an xforms that is too old)
I reinstalled the old one and now it works! So people don't use
the 7.0 version of xforms but the one for 6.x latest version xforms-0.
On 13-Mar-2001 John Levon wrote:
> The problem is described in INSTALL. Basically an xforms include is including
> an Xt header which it doesn't need to, which defines Object.
Ok so Lars was right. I just installed xforms from the powertools-cd as
it seemed a newer version (and one hopefully fo
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Be sure to upgrade to the most recent packages.
> >
> > (up2date --nosig --list --register)
> > (up2date --nosig --update)
>
> I have a local mirror of the updates directory and check the rpm-update
On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Be sure to upgrade to the most recent packages.
>
> (up2date --nosig --list --register)
> (up2date --nosig --update)
I have a local mirror of the updates directory and check the rpm-update
by hand. But ok the only packages up2date would like to updat
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >|
| >| Where do you see that?
| >
| > that Object warning/error.
|
| Well that's what I need help for. If I knew where it came from I would
| have fixed it already. The only thing I see an Object defined i
On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>|
>| Where do you see that?
>
> that Object warning/error.
Well that's what I need help for. If I knew where it came from I would
have fixed it already. The only thing I see an Object defined is in the
sigc++-directory.
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Hmm are you suddenly using a work version (rpm) of xforms?
|
| I've always used an xforms-rpm. What I did was upgrading to 7.0, but that
| was already history. I compiled lyx on Wednsday last time and th
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Hmm are you suddenly using a work version (rpm) of xforms?
|
| I've always used an xforms-rpm. What I did was upgrading to 7.0, but that
| was already history. I compiled lyx on Wednsday last time and th
On 13-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hmm are you suddenly using a work version (rpm) of xforms?
I've always used an xforms-rpm. What I did was upgrading to 7.0, but that
was already history. I compiled lyx on Wednsday last time and there it worked
> something more than just an update of
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello!
|
| I just tried to update my source-tree and compile and get this errors.
| Could someone have a look and please help me?
Hmm are you suddenly using a work version (rpm) of xforms?
something more than just an update of your source-tree has ha
Hello!
I just tried to update my source-tree and compile and get this errors.
Could someone have a look and please help me?
make[3]: Entering directory `/nfs/sinco/source/lyx/lyx-devel/src/mathed'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src
-I../../images -I./../
16 matches
Mail list logo
