> no, but backwards-compatibility is not guaranteed,
> or is it at this time??
I currently try to stay compatible in both directions with the math
stuff. If you notice an incombatibility, report it as bug.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > 1.1.6 -> new math-format,
>
> Did I overlook anything?
> The external math format has not changed, has it?
no, but backwards-compatibility is not guaranteed,
or is it at this time??
you are the mars-man, aeh math-man ..
Herbert
> 1.1.6 -> new math-format,
Did I overlook anything?
The external math format has not changed, has it?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eran Tromer wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> > Eran Tromer wrote:
> > Hint: There is no guarantee expressed or implied that you can read files
> > saved with 1.n.xx with 1.n-k.xx
>
> No guarantee assumed. I just thought it would be kind of nice to be able
> to read my own files on other comp
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> Eran Tromer wrote:
> Hint: There is no guarantee expressed or implied that you can read files
> saved with 1.n.xx with 1.n-k.xx
No guarantee assumed. I just thought it would be kind of nice to be able
to read my own files on other computers. I don't necessarily have the
Eran Tromer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There's an issue with reading .lyx files saved by 1.2.0cvs using
> 1.1.6fix2.
Hint: There is no guarantee expressed or implied that you can read files
saved with 1.n.xx with 1.n-k.xx
Ze n and the art of Lyxing.
Garst
Hi,
There's an issue with reading .lyx files saved by 1.2.0cvs using
1.1.6fix2.
Algorithms saved by LyX 1.2.0cvs look like
--
\begin_inset Float algorithm
placement htbp
wide false
collapsed false
\layout Standard
Moose
\end_inset
--
