On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:50:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it
> > > needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thin
should be this reported to the ulem (or cite) package maintainers?
also do we encounter this in our normal documents with citations?
if it cause too much problem, we can revert it back...
It happens that the author of both packages is Donald Arseneau (aka
one of the masters of the style files).
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:50:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it
> > needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thing
> > to do...
>
> no preference here. i will revert it for the time being
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it
> needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thing
> to do...
no preference here. i will revert it for the time being; whosoever want to make
it work even with citations, feel free to take t
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:54:02PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > If someone incurs in this problem, this is the updated workaround:
> >
> > \usepackage{cite}
> > \let\olduline\uline
> > \newsavebox{\cbox}
> > \let\oldcite\cite
> > \newcommand{\newcite}[1]{\sbox\cbox{\oldci
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:39:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > You just broke a number of old documents of mine, but I guess that is
> > unavoidable. The problem is that ulem is incompatible with the cite
> > package and misterious errors occur when you underline a cita
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also
if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable.
i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and the
same holds for th
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:52:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if
it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and
> the same holds for the switch for some boxes or subfloats we have changed
> last year even in branch (cant remember what it was exactly...) in fact i
> seem to be unable to recall when such bumps happen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also
> if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable.
i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and the
same holds for the switch for some boxes or
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> You just broke a number of old documents of mine, but I guess that is
> unavoidable. The problem is that ulem is incompatible with the cite
> package and misterious errors occur when you underline a citation.
should be this reported to the ulem (or cite) package maintain
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> But you need to bumo the file format.
>
> eh? we increase fileformat any time we change
> latex output?
Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also
if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable.
Jürgen
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:52:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if
> > > it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines.
> >
> > i will look whether ulem
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> But you need to bumo the file format.
eh? we increase fileformat any time we change
latex output?
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> checkout the current trunk if thats what you wanted.
I guess it is. Thanks.
But you need to bumo the file format.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if
> > it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines.
>
> i will look whether ulem supports across lines feature.
checkout the current trunk if thats what
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
%\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text
%\uwave{boat}wavy underline
%\xout{removed} marked over with //.
it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
around). the question is - do we
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> That would be an RC setting change, do we have an lfun for that? I mean an
> lfun to change the value of an RC option?
no
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
%\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text
%\uwave{boat}wavy underline
%\xout{removed} marked over with //.
it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
around). the question is - do we want
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if
> it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines.
i will look whether ulem supports across lines feature.
pavel
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> %\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text
>> %\uwave{boat}wavy underline
>> %\xout{removed} marked over with //.
>>
>> it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
>> around). the question is - do we want any of
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
ulem package offer additional text style macros:
%\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text
%\uwave{boat}wavy underline
%\xout{removed} marked over with //.
it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
around). th
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
> around). the question is - do we want any of these in lyx ?
Dunno. However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if
it is available), such that underlined text is broken across l
hi,
ulem package offer additional text style macros:
%\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text
%\uwave{boat}wavy underline
%\xout{removed} marked over with //.
it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code
around). the question is - do we
24 matches
Mail list logo
