Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it > needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thing > to do...
no preference here. i will revert it for the time being; whosoever want to make it work even with citations, feel free to take the patch over. i dont want to spent my time on this. still - i can produce patch for new ulem's underline, while letting the old underbar style exists, if there is some request. pavel
