Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-11 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Bo Peng schrieb: In addition, INSTALL.scons describes how to use scons on all platforms, I recently added some more infos to this file and try to keep it up to date. So I think when someones follows the steps in this file, he will be able to build LyX. When, not please improve this file. r

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-11 Thread Bo Peng
> Well, what is missing is that if you try to do what INSTALL.* says, you have > to download things that don't exist, then you need to do some magic things, > andsoforth. I can't give you more details right now, but I'll come back to > it later. In addition, INSTALL.scons describes how to use scon

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Uwe Stöhr schreef: > Hopefully the build tool docs for windows are also updated one time.. What is missing? regards Uwe Well, what is missing is that if you try to do what INSTALL.* says, you have to download things that don't exist, then you need to do some magic things, andsofort

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> Hopefully the build tool docs for windows are also updated one time.. What is missing? regards Uwe

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Christian Ridderström schreef: On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from the Win world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy release. I suspect we owe thanks to the people behind the Windows installe

RE: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread leuven edwin
next time i would wait with going into beta after the summer and not just before... ed.

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I think that we should reconsider the meaning of the term "release candidate" :-) In my opinion, a release candidate is something that is really intended to be released as a final version, if no really crucial problem occurs while testing it. I think this is a worry

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
José Matos wrote: > Hi all, > in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for > feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0 > > I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid > the > transient state that occurs after the release. We ar

Re: Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-10 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from the Win world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy release. I suspect we owe thanks to the people behind the Windows installers (Uwe and Joost) for this. Ma

Evaluation of the 1.6 development cycle

2008-12-09 Thread José Matos
Hi all, in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0 I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid the transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to ev