On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> I'm a bit astonished that you talk about these facts ... because
> there are some tables with some formats
> on the other hand, I don't change the fileformat.
I don't follow you here? If you mean the new tabular format then that
format was discussed for
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > again: the only reason for my ERT were the
> > problems with the actual one. with all my proposals you
> > do the same: "discussing what should really be ..."
> > a bit annoying
>
> Sure but as you said they are "proposals" and I
On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> again: the only reason for my ERT were the
> problems with the actual one. with all my proposals you
> do the same: "discussing what should really be ..."
> a bit annoying
Sure but as you said they are "proposals" and IMO proposals should be
discussed. It wo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I do have the following idea on improving the current ERT inset:
> | (recall that the ERT inset has 3 states: open, collapsed, and inline)
> | When you press ctrl+l, an inline inset is generated. If the user presses
> | enter or C-enter, than the inset automatically
On 24-Oct-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Was it in good shape?
Well we surely would have to adapt it to the new inset interface but
for simple ascii inset IMO it was good enough. But we would have to
have a look at it!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On 24-Oct-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This seems a bit complicated to me... Editing both in a popup or in
> inline view.
No I don't want to edit in the inline view I just want it as a display
option! But it seems Dekel is having an other opinion and his arguments
are not wrong IMO.
> Of
>> We would have the inline view and the button-view (collapsed).
>
> Sorry for being slow again: What was the difference between "inline view"
> and "button view"?
Try it just click with the right mousebutton on a ERT inset and select
the different possible views!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This seems a bit complicated to me... Editing both in a popup or in
> | inline view.
> |
> | One very good thing about Herbert proposal is that we would just avoid
> | using insettext for ert (which avoids a lo
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 10:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> What I thought about this is that we shouldn't use a
> Juergen> InsetCommand Type inset as that does not have inline view
> Juergen> (just the button view wh
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:40:37AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> What I thought about this is that we shouldn't use a InsetCommand
> Type inset as that does not have inline view (just the button view
> which for some is not enough). We would have to use the actual ERT
> inset but we don't permit e
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/ERT.html
>
> It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have
> a nicer editor. On the other hand
On 24-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> sure, but where is the sense? Jürgens idea of a "wysiwyg" ERT is
> much nore better than my GUI solution!!! But there are still
> (not easy to solve - am I right??) problems with it, so I thought,
> it's better to choose a solution with a clear background:
On 24-Oct-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Will we have an inlined view that retains state during
> save/re-opening/spellchecking?
What I thought about this is that we shouldn't use a InsetCommand
Type inset as that does not have inline view (just the button view
which for some is not enough). We wo
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:57:03AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
[...]
> > I agree with Jürgen. It looks prety, but I am one of the people who would
> > like to see a inline version, if possible, as we have now.
>
> have a look at attached gif for some more expl
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> [...]
> > It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> > type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have
> > a nicer editor. On the other hand peo
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> [...]
> > It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> > type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have
> > a nicer editor. On the other hand peo
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> [...]
>
> > It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> > type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We
> > would have a nicer editor. On the other hand peop
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this type.
> Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have a
> nicer editor. On the other hand people who complained that they would
> like to see the
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[...]
> It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have
> a nicer editor. On the other hand people who complained that they would like
> to se
On 23-Oct-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> seems to be that it's not interesting, maybe that there are
No I find it really interesting already by your description yesterday,
but I didn't find the time to have a look at it.
> no problems with it ...
> anyway, a small preview:
>
> http://www.educat.hu
seems to be that it's not interesting, maybe that there are
no problems with it ...
anyway, a small preview:
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/ERT.html
HErbert
21 matches
Mail list logo
