Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:45:10AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 schrieb Richard Heck:
configure:4079: checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89
configure:4153: gcc  -c -g -O2  conft
Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:45:10AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 schrieb Richard Heck:
> > > configure:4079: checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89
> > > configure:4153: gcc  -c -g -O2  conftest.c >&5
> > > conf
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:45:10AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 schrieb Richard Heck:
> > configure:4079: checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89
> > configure:4153: gcc  -c -g -O2  conftest.c >&5
> > conftest.c:11:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
> > conft
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 schrieb Richard Heck:
> configure:4079: checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89
> configure:4153: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
> conftest.c:11:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
> conftest.c:12:23: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
> conftest.c:13:
On one of my machines, running Fedora 10, I'm having trouble with
configure in branch. Here's the error:
checking how to run the C preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: in `/home/rgheck/cvs/lyx-pristine':
configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
See `config.log' for
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:29:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you use this URL:
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> And I can get all distribution there.
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywo
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you use this URL:
>
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
And I can get all distribution there.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=autoconf&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Thanks.
So we shall set
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:03:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This doesn't seem to be the case anymore:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=automake&searchon=names&subword=1&version=stable&release=all
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This doesn't seem to be the case anymore:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=automake&searchon=names&subword=1&version=stable&release=all
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=autoconf&sear
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:14:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> >> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I don't know, you're the autoconf e
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I don't know, you're the autoconf expert here ;-)
>> > IMO, the most easy option is requiring automake 1.7 or later.
>>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't know, you're the autoconf expert here ;-)
> > IMO, the most easy option is requiring automake 1.7 or later.
>
> Which would mean in turn autoconf 2.54. I am not sur
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know, you're the autoconf expert here ;-)
> IMO, the most easy option is requiring automake 1.7 or later.
Which would mean in turn autoconf 2.54. I am not sure if it can be a
problem for someone. What is debian-stable sing these days?
JMarc
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:36:47AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > According to
> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/automake/NEWS?rev=1.331&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=automake
> >
> > I think we should bump the r
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/automake/NEWS?rev=1.331&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=automake
>
> I think we should bump the required automake version from 1.5 to 1.7.
> JMarc?
So there are 3 functions: AC_CO
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:39:21PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:30:11PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> >
> >> Everytime I configure LyX recently, I've been getting the following:
> >>
> >> configure.ac:7: `automak
On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:30:11PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
Everytime I configure LyX recently, I've been getting the following:
configure.ac:7: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not
`AC_CONFIG_HEADER'
which causes configure to abor
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:30:11PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> Everytime I configure LyX recently, I've been getting the following:
>
> configure.ac:7: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not
> `AC_CONFIG_HEADER'
>
> which causes configure to abort. If I run autogen.sh and then
> configu
Everytime I configure LyX recently, I've been getting the following:
configure.ac:7: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not
`AC_CONFIG_HEADER'
which causes configure to abort. If I run autogen.sh and then
configure, I still get the error message, but configure continues.
Does someone
> "Roger" == Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> make failed with many undefined symbols so it looks like the
Roger> LDFLAGS declaration is still needed for the frameworks etc.
Can I see the errors (and the config.log)?
JMarc
With config/qt4.m4 PKG_CONFIG patch and LDFLAGS declared as
instructed in INSTALL.MacOSX file lyx-1.5.0rc2 built successfully.
Roger
After make distclean and restarting the computer I updated config/
qt4.m4 with the PKG_CONFIG patch.
Without declaring LDFLAGS
./configure --prefix=/path/to/LyX.app --with-version-suffix=-1.5 --
without-x --with-frontend=qt4 --with-qt4-dir=/path/to/QT4 --with-
included-gettext --enable-optimiz
> "Roger" == Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> LDFLAGS was set as instructed in INSTALL>MacOSX. Complied OK
Roger> and installed on my PowerBook G4 without the additional
Roger> pkgconfig patch.
OK, so what I mean is that with my patch you would not need to set
LDFLAGS befo
LDFLAGS was set as instructed in INSTALL>MacOSX.
Complied OK and installed on my PowerBook G4 without the additional
pkgconfig patch.
Roger
> "Roger" == Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> I just spent a lot of time trying to find out why configure
Roger> wouldn't work on a Mac PowerPC because of the "qt 4 library not
Roger> found !" response.
Did you set the LDFLAGS as instructed in INSTALL>MacOSX?
Roger> I fin
I just spent a lot of time trying to find out why configure wouldn't
work on a Mac PowerPC because of the "qt 4 library not found !"
response.
I finally discovered that the pkgconfig package wasn't installed on
this particular machine.
With pkgconfig installed, configure managed to find the
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> so you should find the strings "\\arabic{section}" and
>> "\\Alph{section}" in the .pot file.
Bennett> Yes -- they're all there (at least every one I checked!).
Very good. I'll apply the patch.
JMarc
On Sep 13, 2005, at 8:56 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What I am interested in are entries related to LabelString in layout
files, so my enumi example was not very well chosen.
Actually, it was my fault: I was stupidly looking at lyx.pot from the
wrong build.
For example, numarticle.inc
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The important question is whether the information in lyx.pot is
>> reasonable. You should see entries like:
>>
>> msgid "\\arabic{enumi}." msgstr ""
>>
>> (what is imp
On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The important question is whether the information in lyx.pot is
reasonable. You should see entries like:
msgid "\\arabic{enumi}."
msgstr ""
(what is important here is the double backslash).
I don't get \\arabic{enumi} in particular. I
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> That seems to work for me.
The important question is whether the information in lyx.pot is
reasonable. You should see entries like:
msgid "\\arabic{enumi}."
msgstr ""
(what is important here is the double backslash).
JMarc
On Sep 12, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
To fix 2/ properly, I see two radically different solutions:
a) set POSIXLY_CORRECT before invoking awk, so that gawk is in
POSIX mode and w
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> To fix 2/ properly, I see two radically different solutions:
>> a) set POSIXLY_CORRECT before invoking awk, so that gawk is in
>> POSIX mode and we can use the second gsub flavour.
Angus> I think tha
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> To fix 2/ properly, I see two radically different solutions:
> a) set POSIXLY_CORRECT before invoking awk, so that gawk is in POSIX
> mode and we can use the second gsub flavour.
I think that an app that conforms to POSIX has at least some chance of
working in a mult
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Some Luddite decided to add gawk-specific code. I believe that
Angus> Lars knows where and what...
Well, actually, the gawk-specific code was already there, but we did
not test for it, and thus created broken .pot files. The two pr
Bennett Helm wrote:
> Now that I've finally got cvs set up again, I notice that there's a
> problem with configure on machines without gawk (like Mac OS X).
> Although the code starting at line 1904 correctly finds that I don't
> have gawk, mawk, or nawk but do have awk, and although ac_cv_prog_AW
Now that I've finally got cvs set up again, I notice that there's a
problem with configure on machines without gawk (like Mac OS X).
Although the code starting at line 1904 correctly finds that I don't
have gawk, mawk, or nawk but do have awk, and although ac_cv_prog_AWK
is properly set to
John, I have a fix for it. Don't look at the code generated, it is so
kind of horrible shell hacks taken from autoconf
I am confident they work, in fact. The problem was later in the code.
JMarc
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:05:15PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> +checking for "groff"... ./configure: test: unknown operator -t
> configure: error: ./configure failed for lib
# Extract the first word of "$ac_prog", so it can be a program name with args.
set dummy $ac_prog ; ac_word=$2
what i
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I know autogen.sh does it, but is it enough?
|
| Ohh I didn't see that :). I just did an cvs update and the make :)
| probably I should have done a make maintainer-clean;./autgen.sh;configure;make,
| but how does one know when to do that and when not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Juergen> But shouldn't this be automated. It seems easy to do :)
|
| I know autogen.sh does it, but is it enough?
Yes.
Lgb
On 25-Oct-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I know autogen.sh does it, but is it enough?
Ohh I didn't see that :). I just did an cvs update and the make :)
probably I should have done a make maintainer-clean;./autgen.sh;configure;make,
but how does one know when to do that and when not.
IMO P
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Hi! I added some files and then when remaking all I get this:
Juergen> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `POTFILES.in', needed by
Juergen> `POTFILES'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory
Juergen> `/nfs/sinco/source/lyx/lyx-deve
Hi!
I added some files and then when remaking all I get this:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `POTFILES.in', needed by `POTFILES'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/nfs/sinco/source/lyx/lyx-devel/po'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
I know we can create this POTFILES.in using:
grep -E "
44 matches
Mail list logo
