Am Sonntag, 12. März 2017 um 19:52:57, schrieb Guillaume Munch
> Le 12/03/2017 à 16:51, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >
> > Should we emit a warning (which probably will be ignored) or better refuse
> > to build
> > with "5.0" <= QT < "5.4" ?
>
> I don't think so, the indication INSTALL file should b
Le 12/03/2017 à 16:51, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Should we emit a warning (which probably will be ignored) or better refuse to
build
with "5.0" <= QT < "5.4" ?
I don't think so, the indication INSTALL file should be enough in that case.
From my POV, if user selects QT5, we should use it.
A
Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:23:22, schrieb Guillaume Munch
> Le 11/03/2017 à 18:07, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
> > Le 11/03/2017 à 17:57, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >
> >> I see the same with installed QT5.2.1. But no problems with QT5.7.
> >
> > Seems that I've got 5.3.2 here, Debian Jessie
Le 11/03/2017 à 18:07, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 11/03/2017 à 17:57, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I see the same with installed QT5.2.1. But no problems with QT5.7.
Seems that I've got 5.3.2 here, Debian Jessie (up to date stable).
Indeed the function is introduced in qt5.4. It is now fix
Le 11/03/2017 à 17:57, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I see the same with installed QT5.2.1. But no problems with QT5.7.
Seems that I've got 5.3.2 here, Debian Jessie (up to date stable).
--
Jean-Pierre
Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 17:43:54, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Hello,
>
> I get this with a clean build of up-to-date master:
>
> /ext/lyx/master/src/support/FileMonitor.cpp: In member function ‘void
> lyx::support::FileMonitorGuard::refresh(bool)’:
> /ext/lyx/master/src/support/FileMon
Hello,
I get this with a clean build of up-to-date master:
/ext/lyx/master/src/support/FileMonitor.cpp: In member function ‘void
lyx::support::FileMonitorGuard::refresh(bool)’:
/ext/lyx/master/src/support/FileMonitor.cpp:115:6: error: no matching function
for call to ‘QTimer::singleShot(int, l
On 04/07/2010 06:19 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 schrieb José Matos:
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 15:23:18 Kornel Benko wrote:
Corrected and commited already.
Sorry for not being responsive, but I broke my right arm, and it is
somehow not easy to use a computer.
Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 schrieb José Matos:
> On Wednesday 07 April 2010 15:23:18 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Corrected and commited already.
> > Sorry for not being responsive, but I broke my right arm, and it is
> > somehow not easy to use a computer.
> >
> > Kornel
>
> I hope you have a f
On 04/07/2010 10:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Sorry for not being responsive, but I broke my right arm, and it is somehow not
easy
to use a computer.
Sorry to hear that!
rh
Am Mittwoch 07 April 2010 schrieb BH:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:29 PM, rgheck wrote:
> I'm guessing this is some Windows, or possibly cmake, thing. This is a
> macro defined in config.h, and it should be available.
> >>>
> >>> Indeed: SCons compiles while CMake doesn't.
> >>
> >> It's
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:29 PM, rgheck wrote:
I'm guessing this is some Windows, or possibly cmake, thing. This is a
macro defined in config.h, and it should be available.
>>>
>>> Indeed: SCons compiles while CMake doesn't.
>>>
>>
>> It's not just Windows -- I have the same problem
On 04/06/2010 08:02 PM, BH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 06.04.2010 02:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
since r34059 I cannot compile LyX:
..\..\src\Buffer.cpp(1571) : error C2065: 'PACKAGE_STRING' :
undeclared identifier
I'm guessing this is some
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Yes, this is missing in the 1.5 branch, please check it in.
Done.
Jürgen
Kornel Benko wrote:
I had to modify "development/cmake/config.h.cmake" in order to get it compile.
Kornel
Yes, this is missing in the 1.5 branch, please check it in.
Peter
I had to modify "development/cmake/config.h.cmake" in order to get it compile.
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: development/cmake/config.h.cmake
===
--- development/cmake/config.h.cmake (Revision 22011)
+++ dev
16 matches
Mail list logo