Am Sonntag, 12. März 2017 um 19:52:57, schrieb Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> > Le 12/03/2017 à 16:51, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > > > Should we emit a warning (which probably will be ignored) or better refuse > > to build > > with "5.0" <= QT < "5.4" ? > > I don't think so, the indication INSTALL file should be enough in that case. > > > > > From my POV, if user selects QT5, we should use it. > > > > Agreed. In addition, from my POV, it is better if Qt5 for big enough > values of 5 are selected as default, so that one does not have to select > it explicitly. >
I have problems with this approach.
So for instance if I prepare the OS environments (like PATH, ldconfig values
etc) for QT4,
cmake only finds QT4.
We would have to provide info about valid paths for 'qmake' (platform and user
dependent).
The complications are not worth the struggle to make it right.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
