Am Donnerstag, 13. September 2001 10:51 schrieb Dekel Tsur:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > PS: Angus, I will check your math panel patch tomorrow (i.e. in
> > > 15 hours) BTW: What happened to your cross reference dialog patch
> > > that allows to use labels
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > PS: Angus, I will check your math panel patch tomorrow (i.e. in 15 hours)
> > BTW: What happened to your cross reference dialog patch that
> > allows to use labels in other documents?
>
> Dekel's I think, not mine; ask him
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:16, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Good news: The frontend stuff seems to stabilize. Quite a number of
>bugs have been fixed today. Thanks, Angus and Jean Marc.
>
> Bad news: The core functions for editing are still rather buggy.
>
Am Dienstag, 11. September 2001 10:52 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Quitter! ;-) I took pity on you and did it myself. See below.
Shame on me ;-)
As a matter of fact, it doesn't look _that_ different to what I've
tried in about 30 variations (at least for someone who doesn't even
know how C++ is pr
On Monday 10 September 2001 21:03, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Monday 10 September 2001 14:13, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > > Err... ... while we are at this:
> > > In Layout > Document > Extras, the "Author-Year/Numerical"-Choice
> > > should only be enabled if th
> Lars> Hmm, when are you notified of these leaks? During program run,
> Lars> or when you exit lyx?
>
> Notification of leaks is always done at program exit.
No, that is not correct. With Purify, you can get a list of memory leaks
at any time of execution. In fact, I can find out whether some
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 14:13, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Err... ... while we are at this:
> > In Layout > Document > Extras, the "Author-Year/Numerical"-Choice
> > should only be enabled if the Natbib-Checkbox is chosen.
>
> Feel free ;-)
Well said...
I have no id
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Lars> | - Minibuffer message is duplicated: | | "LaTeX run number 2
> | Lars> (message LaTeX run number 2)" | | Only occurs when you click at
> | Lars> menu item "View/DVI"; CTRL-D works well
> |
> | Lars> Is it _really_ a
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:13, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Err... ... while we are at this:
> In Layout > Document > Extras, the "Author-Year/Numerical"-Choice
> should only be enabled if the Natbib-Checkbox is chosen.
Feel free ;-)
> BTW: Will the float placement option (in "Extras") rem
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Applied.
Thanks :-)
> > > And finally,
> > > it is possible to edit the field even if it is "Senseless with
> > > this layout!". In other dialogs, such fields are disabled in that
> > > case.
> >
> > Agreed. I don't know how to do this, though :-(
>
> I do. Done.
I knew ;
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Lars> Is it _really_ a problem?
> |
> | Yes, this is bad UI.
>
> so it is not _really_ a problem.
Well... currently (proper lyx-)insets within insets seems to have this
"can't leave to the right" "feature". You might argu
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:31:41PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> (don't kill me but sometimes it looks a little bit "self-made").
Nobody will kill you for that. LyX is a little bit self-made after all...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 08 September 2001 19:26, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > Yes, the field should be renamed to "Longest Label", "Label Text", or
> > something similar.
>
> > While we are discussing the "Paragraph Layout" dialog: Shouldn't we
> > remove "General" or do you inten
On 10 Sep 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - Text in an ERT should be handled verbatim, i.e. double spaces should not
> | be removed automatically
>
> I'd hate to special case this. I'd like to have a InsetVerbatim for
> this inst
> > btw. we need to make a new rule in LyX (that is for 1.3.0cvs): We
> > should _never_ _ever_ pass or return raw pointers, but always wrap
> > them up in some smart pointer.
>
> this will uglify and seriously bloat all the gui code for no real advantage
IMHO
>
> At least in Qt's code
Naaa! I
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:44:00AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | - There are still infinite table repaintings if the width of the table
> | is almost equal to the LyX window size (for details see SourceForge)
>
> Hmm... (I hate running over to SF to get details), I'd like to see a
> wa
Herbert Voss wrote:
> at this time it may be much more important to eliminate the bugs,
> than to discuss floats.
Agreed.
Jürgen
> Herbert
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
>
> | Garst R. Reese wrote:
> | > How do you get a non float figure or table to show up in the List of
> | > Figures/Tables?
> | > If I select caption after a non float table, I set Senseless.
> |
> | There's the non
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> But wouldn't that be the same as using the Here option? Yeah, it no
> longer "floats", but maybe the solution is to move Graphics and Tabular
> material inside Floats. About half the time (used to be 100%) I create
> the graphics, then the float and then cut and paste
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> How do you get a non float figure or table to show up in the List of
> Figures/Tables?
> If I select caption after a non float table, I set Senseless.
There's the nonfloat-package (on CTAN), which defines new \tabcaption
and \figcaption environments. But you have to play
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> here is an example for table, it's nearly the same for
> figure:
>
> http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/floats/nonFloat.html
>
> I'll have a look, if a lyx-layout
> nonfloat-figure
> nonfloat-table
>
> is possible
>
> Herbert
>
But wouldn't that be the same as u
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
>
> > the H-option is absolutely tricky! and from my point of view
> > it should never appear! it gives more trouble than andvantages.
> > and a float is no more a float! it's no problem to place a
> > "nonfloat"-object with or without a captio
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> the H-option is absolutely tricky! and from my point of view
> it should never appear! it gives more trouble than andvantages.
> and a float is no more a float! it's no problem to place a
> "nonfloat"-object with or without a caption in any place of the
> doc without this
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:27:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes, I made the "background" code do the right thing even if the gui
> is "wrong". I am not a gui person, and I have obviously forgot to ask
> people to help me enforce the placement rules in the gui...
are you asking now ?
Herbert Voss wrote:
> forget this statement, Lars is right!
O.K. sorry about the noise.
Jürgen
> Herbert
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> > 3. If I understand
> > http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet/floats/
> > correct (the LaTeX-gurus might correct me), LyX should add the
> > following line to the preamble, if you chose "Here, definitely":
> > \restylefloat{figure} %% or whatever flo
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2001 12:34 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> the H-option is absolutely tricky! and from my point of view
> it should never appear! it gives more trouble than andvantages.
> and a float is no more a float! it's no problem to place a
> "nonfloat"-object with or without a caption in a
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> 3. If I understand
> http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet/floats/
> correct (the LaTeX-gurus might correct me), LyX should add the
> following line to the preamble, if you chose "Here, definitely":
> \restylefloat{figure} %% or whatever float it is
> This is currently not the
Michael Schmitt wrote:
- In the "Float options" dialog, it is possible to select "Bottom of
the page" and "Here, definitely" at the same time. (Why is the dialog
split into two parts at all?) When pressing "apply", four options are
selected.
A few additional comments:
1. The four options are
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Yes, the field should be renamed to "Longest Label", "Label Text", or
> something similar.
> While we are discussing the "Paragraph Layout" dialog: Shouldn't we
> remove "General" or do you intend to add further "pages" to the
> dialog?
This has been done in CVS!
> Mor
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - In document class "scrreport", the default label width for "labeling"
> paragraphs is set to "00.00.". Does that really make sense? Is it
> used to format dates? Label "Width" suggests that you have to specify
>
Michael Schmitt wrote:
- In document class "scrreport", the default label width for "labeling"
paragraphs is set to "00.00.". Does that really make sense? Is it
used to format dates? Label "Width" suggests that you have to specify
some measure (cm/pt/...)
FYI: It is the same in the oth
32 matches
Mail list logo
