[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Why it is our problem to solve? IMHO this should be done on the xforms
| side.
Or rather it should be decided on the xforms side what their policy
is.
It is ok to not have all the libs in the archive/library, but the
static and dynamic lib shoul
On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| So we shouldn't try to find a solution???
>
> You said that we had found the solution, and I say that we have only
> found what the problem is...
Maybe you didn't really read what I wrote, as we did find the solution, but
I will rephrase it for you (
On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >| My assumption in the reply to Rob was right, but here we definitvely have
> | the solution for the problem ;)
> > No, not the solution. libxforms should behave.
The following is from the xforms mailing lis
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>|
>>| ??? You're too cryptic for my likeing on Mondays!
>>
>> the solution is not to figure out what the problem is
>
| So we shouldn't try to find a solution???
You said that we had found the solution, and
On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>|
>| ??? You're too cryptic for my likeing on Mondays!
>
> the solution is not to figure out what the problem is
So we shouldn't try to find a solution??? You get more and more
cryptic or don't you like to work on mondays and so you would like
to leave
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| My assumption in the reply to Rob was right, but here we definitvely have
>>| the solution for the problem ;)
>>
>> No, not the solution. libxforms should be
On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| As I understood his problem he has problems linking the binary not
>| executing it. And as I already explained ldconfig is for runtime
>| only.
>
> For linking also. ld.so.conf also tells the compiler/linker what dirs
> to look in.
I don't believe y
On 08-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| My assumption in the reply to Rob was right, but here we definitvely have
>| the solution for the problem ;)
>
> No, not the solution. libxforms should behave.
??? You're too cryptic for my likeing on Mo
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| My assumption in the reply to Rob was right, but here we definitvely have
| the solution for the problem ;)
No, not the solution. libxforms should behave.
--
Lgb
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 08-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Have you run ldconfig (I think that's what it's called on Linux boxes).
>>
>> Alternatively, from the console type
>>
>> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/xforms.so/lib
>> lyx
>
| As I understood his problem he
On 08-Apr-2002 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> configure:2985: result: xforms
> configure:11553: checking for fl_initialize in -lforms
> configure:11580: g++ -o conftest -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -W -Wall
> -isystem
> /usr/X11R6/include conftest.cc -lforms -lSM -lICE -liberty -lc -lm
> -L/usr/
On 08-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Have you run ldconfig (I think that's what it's called on Linux boxes).
>
> Alternatively, from the console type
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/xforms.so/lib
> lyx
As I understood his problem he has problems linking the binary not
executing it. And
On Saturday 06 April 2002 10:05 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> It now makes .so stuff, but lyx says it cannot find it.
> I can create a symlink libxforms.a to libforms.a and it will statically
> link, but doing the same with libforms.so does not work. Looks like
> either the .so stuff is not complete
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> It now makes .so stuff, but lyx says it cannot find it. I can
Garst> create a symlink libxforms.a to libforms.a and it will
Garst> statically link, but doing the same with libforms.so does not
Garst> work. Looks like either the .so
14 matches
Mail list logo
