Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > btw i dont see tags in the tree from some 1.5.3 release. that is bug of my > git importer or you stop tagging? No, I tag every release: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/tags Jürgen

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I think it's time for another maintenance release. The list of fixes is not > too impressive, but branch has progressed quite a bit nevertheless, compared > to 1.5.5. btw i dont see tags in the tree from some 1.5.3 release. that is bug of my git importer or you stop t

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > > I'm afraid I cannot help you with the build problems. But if it helps, I > > can compile a tarball of current 1.5.6svn for you. > > That would be highly excellent! Grab it here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.5.6svn.tar.gz Jürgen

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I'm afraid I cannot help you with the build problems. But if it helps, I can compile a tarball of current 1.5.6svn for you. That would be highly excellent! /Konrad

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > What about the attached patch? It is a revised version of the patch in > > comment #43 to bug 4966 and its aim is to avoid \textgreek at least when > > using iso-8859-7 encoding. > > With patch attached, this time. all right. Jürgen

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > Additional info: "make dist" then fails with: I'm afraid I cannot help you with the build problems. But if it helps, I can compile a tarball of current 1.5.6svn for you. Jürgen

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:27:42AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:43:54PM +0200, J�rgen Spitzm�ller wrote: > > > There are no critical issues left anymore (at least no reproducable ones), > > except for this (patch from Jean-Marc exists and should go in): > > http:

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-22 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:43:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > There are no critical issues left anymore (at least no reproducable ones), > except for this (patch from Jean-Marc exists and should go in): > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4662 > > Any other issues? What about the

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-21 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Additional info: "make dist" then fails with: ... mkdir ../../LyX-1.5-1.5.6svn/lib/doc/sv cp:.//Users/khofbaue/lyxdevel_15test/lyx-export1/lib/doc/Makefile.depend: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [distdir] Error 1 make[1]: *** [distdir] Error 1 make: *** [distdir] Error 1 A normal "mak

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-21 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Pavel Sanda wrote: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseProcedure#toc6 OK, thanks for the pointer. Does automake need to be called with some parameters (e.g. where the Qt Library is)? I get the following error(?) form a fresh svn tree (Branch) and export. khofbaue$ ./autogen.sh Using automake (

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-20 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Juergen what do you think about > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4749 ? A bit late for 1.5.6, IMHO. Jürgen

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-19 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > There are no critical issues left anymore (at least no reproducable ones), > except for this (patch from Jean-Marc exists and should go in): > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4662 > > Any other issues? Juergen what do you think about http://bugzilla.lyx.org/

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Ramon Flores wrote: > I have took a look at the new pot file, and I have found some messages that > I think shouldn't be there, because they shouldn't be translated. The > messages are: > > 2665 Tgif > >   to > > 2679 XPM > > And some other messages as: > > 2720 LyX 1.3.x > 2721 LyX 1.4.x > > 2726

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Ramon Flores wrote: > I have took a look at the new pot file, and I have found some messages that I > think shouldn't be there, because they shouldn't be translated. The messages > are: > > 2665 Tgif > > to > > 2679 XPM > > And some other messages as: > > 2720 LyX 1.3.x > 2721 LyX 1.4.x >

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > I assume I have to check out the code with: > svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X lyx-1.5.x > > What do I have to change then (so that it configures/compiles in release > mode, and whatever else might be needed in contrast to a tar-ball)? http:/

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: One major thing I'd like to address with 1.5.6 are the Mac issues (screen redrawing issues) that forced some people to stick with 1.5.4. I hope these are build problems we can solve this time. In any case, the Mac binaries should be checked by people who were affected

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Ramon Flores
Em Quinta, 17 de Julho de 2008, o Jürgen Spitzmüller escreveu: > Since I'll go to vacancies after next week, I'm trying to get 1.5.6 out at > the end of next week. Therefore we'd need pending translation patches until > Thursday, July 24. Translators, please let me know if you cannot make it > unt

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are no critical issues left anymore (at least no reproducable ones), > except for this (patch from Jean-Marc exists and should go in): > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4662 I think I fixed it after all. This is only in branch, trun

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> I won't guess a to what the source of the problem is. For all I know it's >> a >> bug in Qt-4.4, but it may well be our build procedure. >> > > You think it IS a Qt-bug? That means you tested

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Bennett Helm wrote: I won't guess a to what the source of the problem is. For all I know it's a bug in Qt-4.4, but it may well be our build procedure. You think it IS a Qt-bug? That means you tested compiling with "all the same, but Qt-4.3" and then it worked for those people ??? /Konrad

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Bennett Helm wrote: The issue was not computer problems for me but rather my upgrading to Mac OS X 10.5, which using my normal build procedure resulted in a binary that could not run on other systems. Konrad eventually figured out new settings that would let me create the binary. But, although th

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > > I really have no idea what the problem is or how to fix it, and I really > > don't have time now to go digging into things I don't understand. Perhaps > > Konrad has some ideas. > > If I recal

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Bennett Helm wrote: > I really have no idea what the problem is or how to fix it, and I really > don't have time now to go digging into things I don't understand. Perhaps > Konrad has some ideas. If I recall correctly, the concerned binary was not built by you, but by Konrad, due to your computer

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-17 Thread Bennett Helm
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One major thing I'd like to address with 1.5.6 are the Mac issues (screen > redrawing issues) that forced some people to stick with 1.5.4. I hope > these > are build problems we can solve this time. In any case, the

Re: Approaching LyX 1.5.6

2008-07-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I think it's time for another maintenance release. The list of fixes is not too impressive, The opposite would be worrying for a 6th minor release ;-) Abdel.