On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:30:22 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch is against my MVC branch (rev 19086). One more
reason why my branch should be merged ASAP ;-)
Revision is 19086. Though, I'm quite sure I produced it
against a bare svn co /trunk.
Is it possible tha
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:33:58 +0300
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tommaso, this patch sounds really interesting to me, I'd
like to try it out. Against what branch/version is the
patch to be applied? It's not applying cleanly for me...
The 'svn diff' command itself added within the p
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tommaso, this patch sounds really interesting to me, I'd like to try
it out. Against what branch/version is the patch to be applied? It's
not applying cleanly for me...
This patch is against my MVC branch (rev 19086). One more reason why
my bra
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Cucinotta Tommaso wrote:
Hi all,
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was imaging it
should have (well, exce
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Cucinotta Tommaso wrote:
Hi all,
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was imaging it
should have (well, exce
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Cucinotta Tommaso wrote:
Hi all,
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was imaging it
should have (well, except macro expansion and rep
Cucinotta Tommaso wrote:
Hi all,
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was imaging it
should have (well, except macro expansion and replace, and making the
Cucinotta Tommaso wrote:
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was imaging it
should have (well, except macro expansion and replace, and making the
code more
Hi all,
I just posted a further fixed/improved patch as attachment
to bug 3998:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
Hopefully the last patch, with everything working as I was
imaging it should have (well, except macro expansion and
replace, and making the code more robust). The c
