Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> student, and he applied his changes with a plain-text editor,
> learning-by-example
> the .lyx syntax, and later he asked me "why don't we use for example latex?",
> and
You made my day :D
On 09/03/14 02:55, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> luckily, we're filling up these weird .lyx files contents using that
>
> Believe it or not there are people who are using scripts for batch creation of
> lyx files for automatized reports and using sed for processing stuff inside
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> luckily, we're filling up these weird .lyx files contents using that
Believe it or not there are people who are using scripts for batch creation of
lyx files for automatized reports and using sed for processing stuff inside it.
But sure, one can move to plain latex.
Pav
On 08/03/14 19:44, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> That being said, I *personally* find XML much too verbose and error
> prone compared to Json if you write it with a plain text editor.
luckily, we're filling up these weird .lyx files contents using that
convenient editor, what's its name?, was it
On 08/03/2014 17:20, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 10:31 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Liviu Andronic
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
wrote:
On 07/03/2014 03:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
On 03/08/2014 10:31 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 07/03/2014 03:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvald
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> On 07/03/2014 03:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>>
>>> ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
>>>
>>>https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
>>
>>
>> Bad
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 03:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>
>> ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
>>
>>https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
>
>
> Bad idea for a document, LyX is used to create structured document, n
On 07/03/2014 03:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
Bad idea for a document, LyX is used to create structured document, not
database, we are not going to create a new directory for each new
in
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > If human readability is the goal we should stay with the current format
> > in the first place ;)
>
> Not really. All the extra lines for inline constructs make it
> considerabely more difficult to read as e.g. LaTeX (and in this regard
> even more difficult to read than X
On 2014-03-07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> > ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
>> >
>> > https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
>> >
>> He makes a strong case for GIT, and against XML. Esp
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
> >
> > https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
> >
> He makes a strong case for GIT, and against XML. Especially taking
> into account human readab
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
>
> https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
>
He makes a strong case for GIT, and against XML. Especially taking
into account human readability of the source file.
Liviu
>
On Mar 6, 2014 8:09 PM, "Tommaso Cucinotta" wrote:
>
> ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
>
> https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
>
> T.
GSOC 2015?
S.
... instead of XML, as discussed so often ...
https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV
T.
15 matches
Mail list logo
