On 2014-03-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > ... instead of XML, as discussed so often ... >> > >> > https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV >> > >> He makes a strong case for GIT, and against XML. Especially taking >> into account human readability of the source file.
However, reading the post and comments I saw just bold statements but no evidence for backing this up. > If human readability is the goal we should stay with the current format > in the first place ;) Not really. All the extra lines for inline constructs make it considerabely more difficult to read as e.g. LaTeX (and in this regard even more difficult to read than XML). Günter
