Re: [PATCH] fix rerunning configure after --with-version-suffix

2008-10-27 Thread José Matos
On Monday 27 October 2008 11:01:04 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > OK for branch. > > Jürgen And certainly OK for trunk. I did notice this bug before but I did not know where to search for... -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] fix rerunning configure after --with-version-suffix

2008-10-27 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Jürgen, José, I guess the following patch is OK for branch and trunk? OK for branch. Jürgen

[PATCH] fix rerunning configure after --with-version-suffix

2008-10-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
The following trivial patch fixes the following annoying problem: when using --with-version-suffix (without value), config.status will be written wrongly and try to run ./configure--with-qt4-lib= [...] This is because our code to add automatically the version number eats the leading space

Re: SCons problem when compiling with version suffix

2007-10-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Bo Peng schrieb: The third line of scons_lyx.log lists the command used, which is simply what it gets from command line. If you get 15 over there, I have no clue what is goine on. I found now the reason: My script started unwanted the script that is in \development\Win32\packaging and used the

Re: SCons problem when compiling with version suffix

2007-10-30 Thread Bo Peng
> When I now execute the command from the batch file, SCons uses "15" as > version suffix and not "16". The third line of scons_lyx.log lists the command used, which is simply what it gets from command line. If you get 15 over there, I have no clue what is goine on. Bo

Re: SCons problem when compiling with version suffix

2007-10-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Bo Peng schrieb: Is this in a batch file? Yes. SCons still gives me this -c install prefix=..\..\build-msvc use_vc=yes frontend=qt4 mode=release version_suffix=15 gettext=system nls=yes in scons_lyx.log Also when I start from scratch and delete the SCons cache, etc. opt.cache will cache

Re: SCons problem when compiling with version suffix

2007-10-30 Thread Bo Peng
On 10/30/07, Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I start compiling LyX with the version suffix "16" using this command: > > call scons install prefix=..\..\build-msvc use_vc=yes frontend=qt4 > mode=release version_suffix=16 > gettext=system nls=yes extra_inc_path=..\..\lyx-windows-deps-msv

SCons problem when compiling with version suffix

2007-10-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
When I start compiling LyX with the version suffix "16" using this command: call scons install prefix=..\..\build-msvc use_vc=yes frontend=qt4 mode=release version_suffix=16 gettext=system nls=yes extra_inc_path=..\..\lyx-windows-deps-msvc-qt4\include extra_lib_path=..\..\lyx-windows-deps-msvc-

Re: What is the path of Resources with --with-version-suffix?

2006-05-18 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Bo Peng a écrit : Hi, Abdel, Under linux, with -with-version-suffix=suf, I will get share/lyxsuf/ share/locale bin/lyxsuf, bin/lyxclientsuf ... What are the directories/names under windows? The suffix strategy is not the same under Windows (changed recently by JMarc and Angus IIRC). With

What is the path of Resources with --with-version-suffix?

2006-05-17 Thread Bo Peng
Hi, Abdel, Under linux, with -with-version-suffix=suf, I will get share/lyxsuf/ share/locale bin/lyxsuf, bin/lyxclientsuf ... What are the directories/names under windows? Bo

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I Bennett> guess I should have been ex

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Bennett Helm
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I Bennett> guess I should have been explicit: never using the version Bennett> suffix on binaries is preferable on

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I Bennett> guess I should have been explicit: never using the version Bennett> suffix on binaries is preferable on Mac.) OK. Can you confirm that the following patch wor

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Bennett Helm
nfigure when the --with-version-suffix option is given. I am not sure which one is better. Bennett I can do as you prefer: if you provide a preference file with the right tex2lyx invocation, getting rid of the version suffix on binaries may be better. Bennett> I've attached the preferences fil

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> An earlier version of this patch removed the additional >> $version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I >> removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the &

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Bennett Helm
-version-suffix option is given. I am not sure which one is better. Bennett I can do as you prefer: if you provide a preference file with the right tex2lyx invocation, getting rid of the version suffix on binaries may be better. I've attached the preferences file that finds the correct te

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Bennett Helm
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the Bennett> following: Bennett> ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token Bennett> `<<<' ./configure: lin

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the Bennett> following: Bennett> ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token Bennett> `<<<' ./configure: line 1593: `<<< .mine' You got a conflict while updat

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Georg Baum
Bennett Helm wrote: > The lines around that are: > > # First check the version > > <<< .mine > echo "configuring LyX version" 1.4.0svn > if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'cvs' >/dev/null ; then > === > echo "configuring LyX version" 1.4.0svn > if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'svn' >/dev/null ; then > >>

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Bennett Helm
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Executables are installed into (for example) Bennett> /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the Bennett> trailing "-", with nothing after it; same is true for oth

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the >> mingw downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work? Angus> I have seen in the past a section titled MSYS

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the mingw > downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work? You do? I don't. I see Current MSYS Developer Tool Kit msys-automake-1.8.2.tar.bz2 304kB 21 Jan, 2004 I have seen in th

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Please do that then. I did it. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, since you plan to do a pre5, I think we can safely apply the | patch and see whether windows/osx packagers complain :) I think the | behaviour for posix is correct. Please do that then. -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
pointed by Bennett about a mixup between Resource/LyX and Resource/LyX${version_suffix}. An earlier version of this patch removed the additional $version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the --with-version-suffix option is g

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
1.4.0, though. Bennett> So, for OS X it would be best IMO to do the following when Bennett> dealing with --with-version-suffix: Bennett> 1. leave executable names alone (to avoid the need for soft Bennett> links), 2. use the --with-version-suffix setting to determine Bennett> the u

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Executables are installed into (for example) Bennett> /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the Bennett> trailing "-", with nothing after it; same is true for other Bennett> executables.) Moreover, the user dir it use

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Jean-Marc> PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling | | It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to | apply that, if OSX and Wind

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-10 Thread Bennett Helm
d=qt --without-x --disable-concept-checks --with-qt- dir=/Users/bennett/lyx/gcc-3.3/qt-mac-free-3.3.5 --without- aiksaurus --without-aspell --without-pspell --enable-optimization=- Os --disable-assertions --disable-stdlib-debug --with-version- suffix), I get: Configuration ... Pack

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-10 Thread Bennett Helm
s/bennett/lyx/ gcc-3.3/qt-mac-free-3.3.5 --without-aiksaurus --without-aspell -- without-pspell --enable-optimization=-Os --disable-assertions -- disable-stdlib-debug --with-version-suffix), I get: Configuration ... Packaging: macosx LyX binary dir: /

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Marc> It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd Jean-Marc> like to apply that, if OSX and Windows people can comment Jean-Marc> on it. Actually it did not

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
on of LyX]) @@ -28,20 +28,19 @@ dnl dnl AC_DEFUN([LYX_VERSION_SUFFIX],[ -AC_MSG_CHECKING([for install target]) +AC_MSG_CHECKING([for version suffix]) RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX='""' AC_ARG_WITH(version-suffix, [ --with-version-suffix[=] install lyx files as lyx], [if test "x$withval&q

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-07 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different > > problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1? > > Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might > be a good idea to mention

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-07 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different > problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1? Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might be a good idea to mention it in the release notes. This is now http://bugzilla.lyx.

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
est. Georg> It works well for me, but it does not address the problem that Georg> the configure script is called without --with-version-suffix, Georg> so tex2lyx is not found. Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1? Her

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-07 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what > happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)). > > Please test. Works as expected here (Solaris Sparc). -- Jean-Pierre

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what > happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)). > > Please test. On Windows a plain --with-version-suffix does not provide a default suffix. I

Re: [PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-06 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what > happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)). > > Please test. It works well for me, but it does not address the problem that the configure script is called without --

[PATCH] bug 2237: --with-version-suffix does not attach suffix to main binaries: lyx, lyxclient, tex2lyx

2006-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
e_args | sed "s,--with-version-suffix,--with-version-suffix=$withval,"` fi - PACKAGE="$PACKAGE$withval" program_suffix=$withval RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX="--with-version-suffix=$withval"]) AC_SUBST(RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX) -AC_MSG_RESULT([$PACKAGE]) +AC_MSG_RESULT([$PACKAGE$withval]) ])

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-11-03 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen, could you try to run ./autogen.sh? There have been changes to > m4 files recently. Yes, that seems to have fixed it. Jürgen

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-11-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> There seems to be a problem with this option. I compile cvs Juergen> --with-version-suffix=-cvs and LyX sets the user dir to ~/./ Juergen> (instead of ~/.lyx-cvs) and installs in

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-11-02 Thread Daniel Watkins
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:59 +, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > did you compile --with-version-suffix? Yup: "./configure --with-frontend=qt --enable-debug --with-version-suffix=-cvs" is my standard configure line, and that's worked fine. Dan

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-11-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> There seems to be a problem with this option. I compile cvs Juergen> --with-version-suffix=-cvs and LyX sets the user dir to ~/./ Juergen> (instead of ~/.lyx-cvs) and installs in

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-11-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Daniel Watkins wrote: > I'm doing the 'make install' (of last night's CVS tree) as I write, and > it seems to be putting everything in the correct place... did you compile --with-version-suffix? Jürgen

Re: --with-version-suffix

2005-10-31 Thread Daniel Watkins
I'm doing the 'make install' (of last night's CVS tree) as I write, and it seems to be putting everything in the correct place... Dan On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:40 +, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > There seems to be a problem with this option. I compile cvs > --with

--with-version-suffix

2005-10-31 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
There seems to be a problem with this option. I compile cvs --with-version-suffix=-cvs and LyX sets the user dir to ~/./ (instead of ~/.lyx-cvs) and installs into /usr/local/share (instead of /usr/local/share/lyx-cvs). Jürgen

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
ean? I am not sure this is going to work always... Lars> Is it correct that "--with-version-suffix" is just a specialized Lars> version of "--program-suffix=..."? No, it also sets PACKAGE to lyx${suffix}. This is the part that ensures that the system and user directories honor the suffix. JMarc

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
t. > | Lars> | Ideas? > | Lars> Not using version-suffix at all? > | One of the useful things with --version-suffix is that it uses | ~/lyx${suffix} as user directory. But this is not a auto* thing. > | Lars> The alternatives is to use DESTDIR and/or set --prefix. (depends | Lar

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> And... is version-suffix our thingie? Not something Lars> automake/autoconf gives us? Then we should try to get rid of it. Lars> | Ideas? Lars> Not using version-suffix at all? One

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Incidentally, I don't think that there's a way currently to Angus> install multiple frontends. If I configure Angus> --with-frontend='xforms qt gtk', then 'make install' installs Angus> only the xforms frontend. I decided to instal

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Another alternative for us is to do what mozilla, gcc and others do. >> >> Have a wrapper for lyx. In the install dirs have >> ../lyx/1.3.4/ >> | ../lyx/1.4.0/ >> >> (with the wrapper you can have param

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Ideas? > > Not using version-suffix at all? Sheeesh, you're a brave man! Do you remember how much effort went into devising a scheme that works? (Ie, the present one.) > The alternatives is to use DESTDIR and/or set --prefix. > (depends on what you want to do.) >

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I compile lyx with version-suffix=1.4.0cvs, and after installing, I >> get: >> {PREFIX}/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/scripts/lyxpreview2bitmap.py-1.4.0cvs >> Needless to say, previews do not work. >

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I compile lyx with version-suffix=1.4.0cvs, and after installing, I | get: > | -rwxr-xr-x1 lasgoutt preval 6422 Jun 7 12:44 /local/lasgoutt/usr/local/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/scripts/lyxpreview2bitmap.py-1.4.0cvs > | Nee

Re: Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I compile lyx with version-suffix=1.4.0cvs, and after installing, I > get: > {PREFIX}/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/scripts/lyxpreview2bitmap.py-1.4.0cvs > Needless to say, previews do not work. > Actually, the same happens with lyx2lyx and everything in the >

Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with version-suffix

2004-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I compile lyx with version-suffix=1.4.0cvs, and after installing, I get: -rwxr-xr-x1 lasgoutt preval 6422 Jun 7 12:44 /local/lasgoutt/usr/local/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/scripts/lyxpreview2bitmap.py-1.4.0cvs Needless to say, previews do not work. Actually, the same happens with lyx2lyx

Re: BUG configuing --with-version-suffix

2002-04-26 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:40:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > If I configure lyx with --with-version-suffix, make and install it and then > run > lyx-1.2.0cvs > then I am unable to import LaTeX files, because lyx looks for reLyX and > cannot find it. It should be lo

BUG configuing --with-version-suffix

2002-04-26 Thread Angus Leeming
If I configure lyx with --with-version-suffix, make and install it and then run lyx-1.2.0cvs then I am unable to import LaTeX files, because lyx looks for reLyX and cannot find it. It should be looking for reLyX-1.2.0cvs. Angus

[PATCH] 1.2.0 install --with-version-suffix

2001-03-02 Thread John Levon
n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * configure.in: + * config/lyxinclude.m4: + * INSTALL: minor changes, become --with-version-suffix + 2001-02-23 John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.in: Index: INSTALL ===